From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CBDC433DF for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461052072C for ; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="RRoL5v47" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729200AbgEUMGr (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 08:06:47 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:58929 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727905AbgEUMGq (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 May 2020 08:06:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590062805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=D4699oCOXFg/X6c5f39ztI4VdLjOgQyKuX0ATjF0vz4=; b=RRoL5v47/0IyuwLRrL0HaGDDQZBkLbxS4zBWh9e3Aag8MGE9JUHlRFQF6dglOqSsTaoLRM YW6zjx14XM748aC1CYU4bVUtUO9ZBDgzg7LxdtkqNZPuzGZv8Z4vZhwm/i73ItXaraByXs lcJPPDOmSWkiMAwKhpmrYQWQE7CntWg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-133-MRI0lwtoMx2MZb7M-0L2hQ-1; Thu, 21 May 2020 08:06:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: MRI0lwtoMx2MZb7M-0L2hQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 357178014D4; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oldenburg2.str.redhat.com (ovpn-114-30.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.30]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8338B19631; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:06:41 +0000 (UTC) From: Florian Weimer To: "Michael Kerrisk \(man-pages\)" Cc: linux-man Subject: Re: [PATCH] ldconfig.8: Mention new default for --format in glibc 2.32 References: <87a722a6yl.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 14:06:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Michael Kerrisk's message of "Thu, 21 May 2020 08:00:00 +0200") Message-ID: <87a7218pbk.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org * Michael Kerrisk: > Hi Florian, > > On Wed, 20 May 2020 at 18:48, Florian Weimer wrote: >> >> This reflects glibc commit cad64f778aced84efdaa04ae64f8737b86f063ab >> ("ldconfig: Default to the new format for ld.so.cache"). >> >> Signed-off-by: Florian Weimer > > Thanks for the patch. Question below. > >> --- >> man8/ldconfig.8 | 8 ++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/man8/ldconfig.8 b/man8/ldconfig.8 >> index eb9c86dae..e184478a7 100644 >> --- a/man8/ldconfig.8 >> +++ b/man8/ldconfig.8 >> @@ -125,8 +125,12 @@ Cache format to use: >> .IR old , >> .IR new , >> or >> -.IR compat >> -(default). >> +.IR compat . >> +Since glibc 2.32, the default is >> +.IR new . >> +.\" commit cad64f778aced84efdaa04ae64f8737b86f063ab >> +Before that, it was >> +.IR both . > > Should "both" be "compat"? Eh, yes. Should I send a new patch? Thanks, Florian