From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kees Cook Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] signal: add taskfd_send_signal() syscall Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:30:40 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20181206121858.12215-1-christian@brauner.io> <87sgzahf7k.fsf@xmission.com> <878t12efg3.fsf@xmission.com> <20181206174129.taakmwekysbkaosu@brauner.io> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20181206174129.taakmwekysbkaosu@brauner.io> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Brauner Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Daniel Colascione , LKML , Linux API , Andy Lutomirski , Arnd Bergmann , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Jann Horn , Andrew Morton , Oleg Nesterov , Aleksa Sarai , Al Viro , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Tim Murray , linux-man , Florian Weimer , Thomas Gleixner , X86 ML List-Id: linux-man@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 9:41 AM Christian Brauner wrote: > I feel changing the name around by a single persons preferences is not > really a nice thing to do community-wise. So I'd like to hear other > people chime in first before I make that change. I don't think the name is hugely critical (but it's always the hardest to settle on). My preference order would be: taskfd_send_signal() pidfd_send_signal() procfd_send_signal() fd_send_signal() But, agreed, I think fdkill() should not be used. -- Kees Cook