From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B731DC47255 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947ED206D9 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 15:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rmktCUUX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729119AbgEKPNd (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2020 11:13:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46464 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726687AbgEKPNd (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2020 11:13:33 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x543.google.com (mail-ed1-x543.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::543]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B137FC061A0C for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x543.google.com with SMTP id h15so5959980edv.2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:13:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=89ywG/Z/F8kS+iY6l2I19V9MOxe5ypc4yb4/3nxwtFk=; b=rmktCUUXmnImP6oXBba6lESibCMQDUg9MtkraxPdP1s7kASSMDaQ9T7gVERGqRQVqa f0QKLPrDoJfcT4lHN1q5T8YlSEdaK/fgLwx1vvO3flTDjunE3/fb5kJwWheVUUselSoW jNM0J77irMyro13y1mcGs/niVkA4KHI6gWrzoRDRcCYEYcYlFuMFjQDiEgpd5a1C/kBk Dfcn6OlffNiWgz1u74qhW/TSJiiU2161J7jccB51FgnAa4uqJun23h8zaQbknpaL8WcG GK4sOfisF4w9f4WwHG0yBcsQKKDqE4aJekeQ1XeBsRrnV/i1wH3EqfVJi34oYMUlmp84 VCCQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=89ywG/Z/F8kS+iY6l2I19V9MOxe5ypc4yb4/3nxwtFk=; b=jOJzuCr2XuwQuTnYaslE4AyrhzZJzNDQVuDH+g+vzoC3BcNISjUI+8TFb2tQCAlyrH UGqce/jCMiA2ccgwauqKYWZWMCn5zIzmZ3SUv/jENyx2NDQnntrp9VbBDP0psy4PikNH vE4UwFWC1UYmvvMj1N79lgha8Q/TQQDcBP7goyNgFgeCmQ47CWdMxpKNMFQ+qbP1QeJD TwG7UfOMgyNPTWbIRWpiQsOPzx+vaIjX8YABA2djB6U7ph0N/uHhZtCIBOBiBbfmI2Rp gLwNcAsRJl+QTwuU/IVdhJArafivLnyNi3NFDH8WAoi+mzxq3tGR9l8svcLYIXpe0WqB du4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYh+hMsMGuIAnqhhylSI25gSu76YSRCtQdtFbWuKysDoab8ONVn OCMYLATmJmyoJ6FKltmDXhEwxPftGIUMPW6uftI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKguAT3Rlal3f0HW9YPBPLNMDM5yd+X3EdZbo5RyRUdOGTSUMCWWvdWdN0ChgP3Zu+Cqq5sIe/BLQ/v8RsSOus= X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d513:: with SMTP id y19mr14366544edq.367.1589210011374; Mon, 11 May 2020 08:13:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 17:13:20 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: open_tree() manpage submission fell through the cracks? To: Jann Horn Cc: linux-man , Petr Vorel Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org Hi Jann, On Mon, 4 May 2020 at 13:18, Jann Horn wrote: > > Hi! > > I noticed that open_tree() doesn't have a manpage yet; and while > looking for a WIP manpage on the lists, I found this mail, which is > from February, submits manpages for open_tree() and other related > syscalls, and doesn't seem to have a response from you: > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200207174236.18882-1-pvorel@suse.cz/ > > I wonder whether maybe you haven't seen that mail in the first place. > It was addressed to linux-man@vger.kernel.org as "To" and > mtk.manpages@gmail.com as "Cc", which is the reverse of what's > suggested at ... > maybe that runs into some filter on your side? Or maybe it just landed > in a spam filter somewhere or something like that? I saw it, but I've been catching up with a lot of other stuff, and aware that dealing with these pages is likely to be a big block of work. It didn't help that the water was already muddy before Petr's mail. Last year, David Woodhouse sent out seven different mails on the same day to different lists, with different pages combined differently in the patches (with most, but not all of the pages appearing twice in different mails), with no explaining cover letter on the patches. I asked David about this at the time, and he said he'd resend in a more orderly fashion after seeing if he would get some feedback from what he'd sent out. There was a little feedeback, but no response to that feedback from David, and no follow-up patches :-(. I've got some more time now, so can probably make some progress on this. But I think we do need David to be actively involved, because even after a quick glance at the pages I can see that I'll have a lot of questions. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/