From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F209C433DF for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C832075A for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dqIg4irn" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726432AbgHDMwS (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:52:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42410 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725932AbgHDMwS (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2020 08:52:18 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x342.google.com (mail-ot1-x342.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::342]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66BE6C06174A; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 05:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x342.google.com with SMTP id k12so13627624otr.1; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:52:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=pMO7xyI02u/N3BhtYFkNjauZHH09qS1894eAogsqric=; b=dqIg4irnWWoY+Y5RxKJEqmwSgROMfRLLQIvLQwZca2rpKDo+n6etnvAPBYGleJ2+rw jBiX/nOfWx/KPTZ+doBnbFLdjLRLYeTh/KC+XddIFecTlCgj3Kz6xWUknyUmLCEZj1pF 3/yiVCFgroeRsYd+JHeXuLL+PDpZvBTSoyXnk1zINW6r6exODy/+inAb/JZ9SgJA9+Gi YMpWh1BkQ1EqMT59UfeO02muIwdsbe/bCllv+ixdsQB+3LNrsSgFNOOhk+nLb/NNAJXc mm6zfNBrDtQ09G+t5EP4VXefsJl+NAzUp21zavSkxdQ709N3ZafisgwGqq/DdhpmOuoS G/TA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pMO7xyI02u/N3BhtYFkNjauZHH09qS1894eAogsqric=; b=miZ+VmBXEUKfFTu+ijNYuOna1/VqK1PIElAiqn5MIIfVmQ7ttDtRcJqLb91wqxQJxp eGtTabL+VfVbr86ILJjcEFRnGXuxbvqxA//IZIHXAi1WNgr6qORXGVYHChVyMF5XfRzr ntLzUsjmAxK0RR3Rn07buw6JezemDKVGzTEijGBO1taXu8xM0ONu/H2zU7Juv7RTIBt/ NFjCSY2kAX2Dy2aBcJ7EDnOToz7UptSzQbECFjuQwqkQb4rAdjbwdW2IVC7VFztCqN2P PjjxS4Npp/r9Ijc9xjIkku8p53V9x3cd7K44HD8ldBLrFp01ysBCe19cHNKQeWRTD2RO yXOw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306947phWW2hNEfrgOOidBKPsYoW+eRdx03r9ABtMl1hUTGfRqS fU6zEbe/KTNYKPSjL3IM5gYH3AfMvelz9rgrEgo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwantcnKcYDUuZ2NeqMXi+nkqQYITvuIUuQn8NpTq7Q1pEvWayGqwiPzaoF9nt+Lij6f/xZwIc/mvJLcfV14IM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:148f:: with SMTP id s15mr16155634otq.323.1596545537578; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 05:52:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1593020162-9365-1-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com> <20200720165205.GI30452@arm.com> <20200729145630.GH21941@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20200729145630.GH21941@arm.com> Reply-To: mtk.manpages@gmail.com From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:52:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] prctl.2 man page updates for Linux 5.6 To: Dave Martin Cc: linux-arch , linux-man , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , Vincenzo Frascino , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-man-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-man@vger.kernel.org > > > There is already inconsistency here: there are may top-level > > > lists using ".IP *" in prctl.2, and plenty of places where the > > > default indentation is used. > > > > I must admit that I'm in the process of rethinking bulleted lists, and > > I have not come to a conclusion (and that's why nothing is said in > > man-pages(7), and also why there is currently inconsistency). > > > > Using .IP with the default indent (8n) results in a very deep indent > > between the glyph and the text, so it's not my preference. > > Is it worth trying to change the default indent in the macro package, or > will that just upset other people? I imagine it would break other stuff. Thanks, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/