Hi Morten, On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 07:28:10PM -0500, Morten Welinder wrote: > I came across some minor issues in some math man pages. > > M. I'll reply to the others separately. [...] > exp10: > The man page probably should come with a warning not to use the > function for the time being. The implementation is pretty bad. For > example, results for integer arguments 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 17 are > needlessly inaccurate. I can't reproduce that. alx@debian:~/tmp$ cat exp10.c #define _GNU_SOURCE #include #include int main(void) { printf("exp10(17): %lf\n", exp10(17)); printf("pow(10, 17): %lf\n", pow(10, 17)); } alx@debian:~/tmp$ gcc -Wall -Wextra exp10.c -lm alx@debian:~/tmp$ ./a.out exp10(17): 100000000000000000.000000 pow(10, 17): 100000000000000000.000000 I'm running libc6 2.37-15. > pow(10,x) is much better, but not perfect. Have a lovely night! Alex -- Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.