From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7A7C54E8D for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B1B207DD for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 09:41:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729422AbgEKJlK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2020 05:41:10 -0400 Received: from mail.fireflyinternet.com ([109.228.58.192]:62201 "EHLO fireflyinternet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725790AbgEKJlK (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2020 05:41:10 -0400 X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=78.156.65.138; Received: from localhost (unverified [78.156.65.138]) by fireflyinternet.com (Firefly Internet (M1)) with ESMTP (TLS) id 21157987-1500050 for multiple; Mon, 11 May 2020 10:41:05 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In-Reply-To: <20200511091142.208787-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> References: <20200511091142.208787-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <20200511091142.208787-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma-fence: use default wait function for mock fences From: Chris Wilson To: Daniel Vetter , LKML Cc: Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics Development , DRI Development , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, Daniel Vetter , linux-media@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <158919006380.1729.6928823811672806738@build.alporthouse.com> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 10:41:03 +0100 Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Quoting Daniel Vetter (2020-05-11 10:11:41) > No need to micro-optmize when we're waiting in a mocked object ... It's setting up the expected return values for the test. -Chris