From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@ndufresne.ca>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] videodev2.h: add V4L2_BUF_CAP_SUPPORTS_PREPARE_BUF/CREATE_BUFS
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 12:03:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181120100310.z5xerjvsf76qqtcd@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8711051e-df50-181f-d5e3-677d63d63465@xs4all.nl>
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:41:42AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 11/20/2018 10:27 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Hans,
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 09:58:43AM +0100, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> Add new buffer capability flags to indicate if the VIDIOC_PREPARE_BUF or
> >> VIDIOC_CREATE_BUFS ioctls are supported.
> >
> > Are there practical benefits from the change for the user space?
>
> The more important ioctl to know about is PREPARE_BUF. I noticed this when working
> on v4l2-compliance: the only way to know for an application if PREPARE_BUF exists
> is by trying it, but then you already have prepared a buffer. That's not what you
> want in the application, you need a way to know up front if prepare_buf is present
> or not without having to actually execute it.
>
> CREATE_BUFS was added because not all drivers support it. It can be dropped since
> it is possible to test for the existence of CREATE_BUFS without actually allocating
> anything, but if I'm adding V4L2_BUF_CAP_SUPPORTS_PREPARE_BUF anyway, then it is
> trivial to add V4L2_BUF_CAP_SUPPORTS_CREATE_BUFS as well to avoid an additional
> ioctl call.
>
> Hmm, I should have explained this in the commit log.
Please add:
Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
--
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-20 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-20 8:58 [PATCH] videodev2.h: add V4L2_BUF_CAP_SUPPORTS_PREPARE_BUF/CREATE_BUFS Hans Verkuil
2018-11-20 9:27 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-11-20 9:41 ` Hans Verkuil
2018-11-20 10:03 ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2018-11-20 11:39 ` kbuild test robot
2018-11-20 11:48 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181120100310.z5xerjvsf76qqtcd@paasikivi.fi.intel.com \
--to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas@ndufresne.ca \
--cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).