On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 11:54:12AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:59 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:57:48PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:30 PM Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 06:24:34PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > Unfortunately default CSI_SCLK rate cannot work properly to > > > > > drive the connected sensor interface, particularly on few > > > > > Allwinner SoC's like A64. > > > > > > > > > > So, add mod_rate quirk via driver data so-that the respective > > > > > SoC's which require to alter the default mod clock rate can assign > > > > > the operating clock rate. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki > > > > > --- > > > > > .../platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c | 34 +++++++++++++++---- > > > > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c > > > > > index ee882b66a5ea..fe002beae09c 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/sunxi/sun6i-csi/sun6i_csi.c > > > > > @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ > > > > > #include > > > > > #include > > > > > #include > > > > > +#include > > > > > #include > > > > > #include > > > > > #include > > > > > @@ -28,8 +29,13 @@ > > > > > > > > > > #define MODULE_NAME "sun6i-csi" > > > > > > > > > > +struct sun6i_csi_variant { > > > > > + unsigned long mod_rate; > > > > > +}; > > > > > + > > > > > struct sun6i_csi_dev { > > > > > struct sun6i_csi csi; > > > > > + const struct sun6i_csi_variant *variant; > > > > > struct device *dev; > > > > > > > > > > struct regmap *regmap; > > > > > @@ -822,33 +828,43 @@ static int sun6i_csi_resource_request(struct sun6i_csi_dev *sdev, > > > > > return PTR_ERR(sdev->clk_mod); > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > + if (sdev->variant->mod_rate) > > > > > + clk_set_rate_exclusive(sdev->clk_mod, sdev->variant->mod_rate); > > > > > + > > > > > > > > It still doesn't make any sense to do it in the probe function... > > > > > > I'm not sure we discussed about the context wrt probe, we discussed > > > about exclusive put clock. > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/12/18/584 > > > > "Doing it here is not really optimal either, since you'll put a > > constraint on the system (maintaining that clock at 300MHz), while > > it's not in use." > > But this constraint is only set, for SoC's who need mod_rate change > not for whole SoCs. Still, that constraint is there for the whole system on affected SoCs. Whether it applies to one SoC or not is not really relevant. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com