linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
To: Hugues FRUCHET <hugues.fruchet@st.com>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@bootlin.com>,
	Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>,
	Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com>,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: ov5640: add support of V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 12:13:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190820091311.GB5123@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b43d59c-92d0-7234-71aa-b283e7462a84@st.com>

Hi Hugues,

On Tue, Jul 02, 2019 at 04:05:46PM +0000, Hugues FRUCHET wrote:
> Hi Sakari,
> 
> On 6/27/19 6:05 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > Hi Hugues,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 02:57:04PM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
> >> Add support of V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ, this is needed
> >> by some CSI-2 receivers.
> >>
> >> 384MHz is exposed for the time being, corresponding
> >> to 96MHz pixel clock with 2 bytes per pixel on 2 data lanes.
> >>
> >> This setup has been tested successfully with ST MIPID02
> >> CSI-2 to parallel bridge.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Hugues Fruchet <hugues.fruchet@st.com>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Thanks for the patch.
> > 
> > The driver calculates the sensor configuration based on its configuration,
> > and this needs to be reflected in the link frequency: it's not a static
> > value. See e.g. ov5640_calc_sys_clk().
> > 
> 
> I know this code, but for a reason I don't understand yet, this seems
> to not have effects on the CSI-2 link frequency.
> 
> This has been verified with MIPID02 CSI-2 bridge which only work with
> this fixed link frequency as input to program its ui_x4 register 
> setting, see 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg2028171.html.
> All resolutions and all framerate have been tested succesfully with this 
> setting.
> 
> Initially I tried to set the link frequency according to the value 
> computed in ov5640_calc_sys_clk() but it was only functional when 
> resolutions/framerate was close to the 384MHz value...
> 
> As OV5640 D3 engineering board has been initially developped for 
> dragonboard, I'll dig into this and found this commit:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/886794/
> which set a fixed pixel rate value to 96MHz, which match perfectly
> with the 384MHz value I found for link frequency...
> 
> Perhaps other CSI-2 OV5640 users can comment about it and have the 
> explanations of what I experiment...
> Maxime, Jacopo, do you have any idea about it ?

I would also like to wee a comment from someone who's familiar with the
device. Yet I can tell a static value of 348 MHz is clearly incorrect as it
ignores sensor runtime configuration as well as platform configuration
(external clock frequency for instance).

Generally speaking, configuring a CSI-2 receiver to expect a particular
frequency usually doesn't mean it's going to fail even if the transmitter
uses a different frequency, albeit the likelihood of it not working
increases as the difference grows. Could the problem be at the receiver's
end?

Have you checked what kind of values ov5640_calc_pclk() returns for
different configurations? It would seem like that this is what the
LINK_FREQ (divided by lanes and multiplied by two) should be.

> 
> 
> >> version 2:
> >>    - do not set control read only as per Hans' comment:
> >>      See https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-media@vger.kernel.org/msg147910.html
> >>
> >>   drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> >> index 82d4ce9..e6307f3 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5640.c
> >> @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ struct ov5640_ctrls {
> >>   	struct v4l2_ctrl *test_pattern;
> >>   	struct v4l2_ctrl *hflip;
> >>   	struct v4l2_ctrl *vflip;
> >> +	struct v4l2_ctrl *link_freq;
> >>   };
> >>   
> >>   struct ov5640_dev {
> >> @@ -2198,6 +2199,10 @@ static int ov5640_try_fmt_internal(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>   	return 0;
> >>   }
> >>   
> >> +static const s64 link_freq_menu_items[] = {
> >> +	384000000,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>   static int ov5640_set_fmt(struct v4l2_subdev *sd,
> >>   			  struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> >>   			  struct v4l2_subdev_format *format)
> >> @@ -2636,6 +2641,8 @@ static int ov5640_s_ctrl(struct v4l2_ctrl *ctrl)
> >>   	case V4L2_CID_VFLIP:
> >>   		ret = ov5640_set_ctrl_vflip(sensor, ctrl->val);
> >>   		break;
> >> +	case V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ:
> >> +		return 0;
> >>   	default:
> >>   		ret = -EINVAL;
> >>   		break;
> >> @@ -2703,6 +2710,9 @@ static int ov5640_init_controls(struct ov5640_dev *sensor)
> >>   				       V4L2_CID_POWER_LINE_FREQUENCY_AUTO, 0,
> >>   				       V4L2_CID_POWER_LINE_FREQUENCY_50HZ);
> >>   
> >> +	ctrls->link_freq = v4l2_ctrl_new_int_menu(hdl, ops, V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ,
> >> +						  0, 0, link_freq_menu_items);
> >> +
> >>   	if (hdl->error) {
> >>   		ret = hdl->error;
> >>   		goto free_ctrls;
> >> -- 
> >> 2.7.4
> >>
> > 
> 
> BR,
> Hugues.

-- 
Sakari Ailus
sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-20  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-27 12:57 [PATCH v2] media: ov5640: add support of V4L2_CID_LINK_FREQ Hugues Fruchet
2019-06-27 16:05 ` Sakari Ailus
2019-07-02 16:05   ` Hugues FRUCHET
2019-08-20  9:13     ` Sakari Ailus [this message]
2019-08-21 14:24       ` Jacopo Mondi
2019-09-03 14:48         ` Hugues FRUCHET
2020-10-19 13:40           ` Hugues FRUCHET
2020-10-21 16:51             ` Jacopo Mondi
2020-10-22  8:14               ` Hugues FRUCHET
2020-10-22  8:32                 ` Jacopo Mondi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190820091311.GB5123@paasikivi.fi.intel.com \
    --to=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org \
    --cc=hugues.fruchet@st.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=maxime.ripard@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=slongerbeam@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).