From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B36C3A5A5 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016DA20825 for ; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 11:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388581AbfIELfQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:35:16 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:26106 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732741AbfIELfP (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Sep 2019 07:35:15 -0400 X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2019 04:35:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,470,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="358419841" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2019 04:35:10 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.92.1) (envelope-from ) id 1i5q2f-0007DD-8k; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 14:35:09 +0300 Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2019 14:35:09 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com, mchehab@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, drinkcat@chromium.org, tfiga@chromium.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, sj.huang@mediatek.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, sam.hung@mediatek.com, shengnan.wang@mediatek.com Subject: Re: [V2, 1/2] media: i2c: dw9768: Add DT support and MAINTAINERS entry Message-ID: <20190905113509.GD2680@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20190905072142.14606-1-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com> <20190905072142.14606-2-dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com> <20190905101406.GA2680@smile.fi.intel.com> <20190905104829.GB5475@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190905104829.GB5475@paasikivi.fi.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:48:30PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 01:14:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 03:21:41PM +0800, dongchun.zhu@mediatek.com wrote: > > > From: Dongchun Zhu > > > > > > This patch is to add the Devicetree binding documentation and > > > MAINTAINERS entry for dw9768 actuator. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dongchun Zhu > > > --- > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9768.txt | 9 +++++++++ > > > MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++ > > > > This should be: > > 1) two separate patches > > Why? The MAINTAINERS entry is usually added in the first patch needing it, > isn't it? Bindings are required to be a separate patch. Rob, is it still the case or am I mistaken? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko