From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC17C43331 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:02:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7482214DE for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:02:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1567771365; bh=UxRMWOh/mTJxy7AKKGSd+lMbUkSWzK4/wGyu/nnvzTk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=ejv+ZSZlIs6eDyt1vW5RdxGq9u/0ermKyBTIAxHJzLTQ4l/QTkjyXSwhgNmSws6CC zZ6VvO2NjjO46d4GAhn6jlJhD03ICxEacpzVfSGk9jVZNdLTobqQi2o9i6oqbUM/f/ 1aiaa9hSL4D2h0GJEwksFJ/L14Bs/attqpus2VFQ= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391192AbfIFMCm (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:02:42 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:43820 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388384AbfIFMCl (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2019 08:02:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nM0u5Zwq/3ANoKVqYW1XKfXAdbkiEeIYyJ22EK0M/e4=; b=bV6/1kh/QpXrOH7u71wDiTaNu pT/ORqN8EtynTeqdqeyQHlooZkY6g/alSG0BTEA+kysQ+ScXgQLc4ItDM80QG+dtmDf13oYK2PxQL XfVROo0Z/v6AxdIi9Gc6yndrUK2UeA5SjllC/kTutMJtoFnnsUBu7Cdx2LV/8Vc4HEFRHmyc6zebe nhLkrO2hcNsUXuKuTAFf0Sh/78BTc0UpzwWY9pdrjZMTCfMalUL1lwntBwXKiVb+vIbTIOpjU/0Z8 dW2SkAK83ynfTWkXFxyG4PSELjtDmpt9bbLRbao6N6ihr5VqgOS2B83LnxBdzTIaptHL5fHsWU9w3 g+m2Dk+LA==; Received: from [177.159.253.249] (helo=coco.lan) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i6Cwm-00067t-PV; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 12:02:37 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 09:02:28 -0300 From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab To: Joe Perches Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Sven Eckelmann , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Doug Smythies , =?UTF-8?B?QXVyw6lsaWVu?= Cedeyn , Vincenzo Frascino , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , Thierry Reding , Armijn Hemel , Jiri Olsa , Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Federico Vaga , Allison Randal , Alexander Shishkin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Address issues with SPDX requirements and PEP-263 Message-ID: <20190906090228.1971ede9@coco.lan> In-Reply-To: <20daa66d58e01f33a248b8703aa8e37933ef4154.camel@perches.com> References: <20daa66d58e01f33a248b8703aa8e37933ef4154.camel@perches.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, 05 Sep 2019 13:05:08 -0700 Joe Perches escreveu: > On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 16:57 -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > The description at Documentation/process/license-rules.rst is very strict > > with regards to the position where the SPDX tags should be. > [] > > PS.: I sent already a RFC version for those patches along with this > > thread: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b32c2e46b91e7bcda2a9bd140673f06d71b2487a.camel@perches.com/ > > Nice, thanks. > > Now I guess I have to update checkpatch too. > (unless you want to... ;) Yeah, it makes sense to update checkpatch too. Perhaps it could be changed to use the "-s" flag on the check, instead of implementing its own logic to handle the position. Thanks, Mauro