linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] media: i2c: ov5645: Drop reading clock-frequency dt-property
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 23:55:52 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414205552.GN19819@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200407151401.GA5206@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>

Hi Sakari,

On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 06:14:01PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 03:21:06PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 09:22:41AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:32:34PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 07:51:08PM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:42:38PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> >>>>> Modes in the driver are based on xvclk frequency fixed to 24MHz, but where
> >>>>> as the OV5645 sensor can support the xvclk frequency ranging from 6MHz to
> >>>>> 24MHz. So instead making clock-frequency as dt-property just let the
> >>>>> driver enforce the required clock frequency.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Even if some current systems where the driver is used are using 24 MHz
> >>>> clock, that doesn't mean there wouldn't be systems using another frequency
> >>>> that the driver does not support right now.
> >>>> 
> >>>> The driver really should not set the frequency unless it gets it from DT,
> >>>> but I think the preferred means is to use assigned-clock-rates instead, and
> >>>> not to involve the driver with setting the frequency.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Otherwise we'll make it impossible to support other frequencies, at least
> >>>> without more or less random defaults.
> >>> 
> >>> We're running in circles here.
> >>> 
> >>> As the driver only supports 24MHz at the moment, the frequency should be
> >>> set by the driver, as it's a driver limitation. We can then work on
> >>> supporting additional frequencies, which will require DT to provide a
> >>> list of supported frequencies for the system, but that can be done on
> >>> top.
> >> 
> >> I guess it would be possible to use different external clock frequencies on
> >> a sensor in a given system but that seems to be a bit far fetched, to the
> >> extent I've never seen anyone doing that in practice.
> >> 
> >> Originally, the driver set the frequency based on the clock-frequency
> >> property. If we're removing that but use a fixed frequency instead, then
> >> how is that going to work going forward when someone adds support for other
> >> frequencies in the driver and has a system requiring that, while there are
> >> some other platforms relying on the driver setting a particular frequency?
> > 
> > The standard property for this is link-frequencies, not clock-frequency.
> > Deprecating clock-frequency now paves the way to use the standard
> > property later when/if someone implements support for additional
> > frequencies.
> 
> The external clock frequency and link frequency are different indeed, but
> they are related. The link frequency has been selected in a way that it is
> possible to generate that exact frequency using the chosen external clock
> frequency. If you change the external clock frequency, chances are good
> there is no PLL configuration to generate that link frequency.

But aren't we supposed to pick the clock frequency based on the link
frequency specified in DT ?

In any case, this policy needs to be carefully documented.

> >> Although, if you're saying that this driver only needs to work with DT that
> >> comes with the kernel and you don't care about DT binary compatibility,
> >> this would be fine.
> > 
> > I believe this series to not break backward compatibility, as the driver
> > only works with a 24MHz clock, so I expect all DTs to specify that.
> 
> What you're still doing here is defining the DT bindings based on the
> current driver implementation, not the device properties.

Quite the contrary, the device doesn't require any particular input
clock frequency, so we're removing that from DT :-) Specifying the clock
frequency in DT is in my opinion a manual workaround for not computing
it at runtime based on the desired link frequency, while the link
frequency is a property of the system as it specifies the range of link
frequencies that are safe to use from an EMC point of view.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-06 16:42 [PATCH v5 0/5] ov5645: Deprecate usage of the clock-frequency Lad Prabhakar
2020-04-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: Deprecate usage of the clock-frequency property Lad Prabhakar
2020-04-06 17:30   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-07  7:35     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2020-04-07  7:14   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-04-14 13:55   ` Rob Herring
2020-04-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] media: i2c: ov5645: Drop reading clock-frequency dt-property Lad Prabhakar
2020-04-06 16:51   ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-06 17:11     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2020-04-06 17:32     ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-07  6:22       ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-07 12:21         ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-07 15:14           ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-14 20:55             ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-04-14 20:56               ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-15  8:19               ` Maxime Ripard
2020-04-15 16:27               ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-17  2:09                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-06 17:34   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-07  7:36     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2020-04-07  7:16   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-04-07  7:40     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2020-04-07 12:18       ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] media: i2c: ov5645: Turn probe error into warning for xvclk frequency mismatch Lad Prabhakar
2020-04-06 17:35   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-07  7:19   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-04-07  7:43     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2020-04-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] ARM: dts: imx6qdl-wandboard: Drop clock-frequency property from ov5645 node Lad Prabhakar
2020-04-06 17:36   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-06 16:42 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] media: dt-bindings: media: i2c: convert ov5645 bindings to json-schema Lad Prabhakar
2020-04-06 17:43   ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-07  7:46     ` Lad, Prabhakar
2020-04-15 14:43     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200414205552.GN19819@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).