Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] device property: Add a function to test is a fwnode is a graph endpoint

[Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>]

Hi Laurent,

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 09:21:37AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Drivers may need to test if a fwnode is a graph endpoint. To avoid
> hand-written solutions that wouldn't work for all fwnode types, add a
> new fwnode_graph_is_endpoint() function for this purpose. We don't need
> to wire it up to different backends for OF and ACPI for now, as the
> implementation can simply be based on checkout the presence of a
> remote-endpoint property.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/property.h | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
> index 10d03572f52e..9f805c442819 100644
> --- a/include/linux/property.h
> +++ b/include/linux/property.h
> @@ -389,6 +389,11 @@ struct fwnode_handle *
>  fwnode_graph_get_remote_node(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, u32 port,
>  			     u32 endpoint);
>  
> +static inline bool fwnode_graph_is_endpoint(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> +	return fwnode_property_present(fwnode, "remote-endpoint");
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Fwnode lookup flags
>   *

Thanks for the patch. I've bounced it to devicetree and linux-acpi lists
(now cc'd) --- hope that works.

Rafael: do you think this simple patch could go though the media tree,
assuming that folks are generally fine with the patch as such?
Alternatively,

Acked-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus