From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4EFC07548 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BB621556 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="evFgao75" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730572AbgIJKOr (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:14:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44372 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730588AbgIJKOf (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 06:14:35 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com (mail-pj1-x1044.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2044C061756; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id md22so1101399pjb.0; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mlowAeJMKqkcl7Mu0ko5uXG5nR+oH8UXp7jLCOmoM+M=; b=evFgao75kuYNkt4R4dISzYava/Hdxgc2lluO6j07su8K+myo53OpZtCtl37/d5cS92 iTYUyvuFwZguUgUCQ2Q4twgDdnkWDU1+3wqUmETya2d9shKYYHhVbJRJ29NohU3zjfbO 0hPe/FN/pykg2pFbX/9Bn4tXEhjHqg+QWc5DyPFqJ0zpcHM/nZIFXuuYDDrSkfP/oxOm zQt+2mseYJF7JJSuCb8qZVdvvupT5bMsJLpPUha1ya3oe3CnDCzRG2+cfjdVkfTTMU2l RAFklVbQz5EJhk10yu/kZWq60PprxrPUvu4Y5jYbDSOcErUlJSrXQI783WXagVbizV5q RZRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=mlowAeJMKqkcl7Mu0ko5uXG5nR+oH8UXp7jLCOmoM+M=; b=BWtKavMvRfuGuVIEvNwguscdJYRlLJ98KNbLoY1iZLUQuWzdU1WyS9z/XQqLIDT+1c lhOoOEjXM+sgzrrXlt07sq3vbne6uWU/NT8xZm6nXKAb9USdkGjZ580ANAN1hrwmg0Ae GJT4N8ADMjnj/EzCfTakl+kDijLeGjAfnDnRI9NqmigGKBLM3BeQZ8QwsxX5vSfDz8kt TuhvLFETUXO956MgDA+TVFTz0uGIx4N+OOIoprgOA0G/tGyvIDvEszeLq8zaM+ViRpKM 6CkH2jbKis1z0vz797CQMDTs6UPIIVQkYNiZvNwLFq9Qfa87c406pN1/AYcQr2VdFX3b /wfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533XYS0C4xLRK+nj6jPkXqbe6c4kauJIWkuunbdqwEaYJzOcfK1a Sd3wMDT3ZRs7wHFSSJET9nQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwG0X9iBwFstxXRg+m9cgl4mftTgFYyg5wVNa4+LLL10Xlckr4+OdMweuV+oonbp2xPkWTYOg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6ac1:: with SMTP id i1mr4961217plt.60.1599732874441; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2401:fa00:8f:203:a6ae:11ff:fe11:4b46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t24sm4723914pgo.51.2020.09.10.03.14.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 03:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 19:14:31 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Hans Verkuil Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Tomasz Figa , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Media Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/28] media/v4l2: remove V4L2-FLAG-MEMORY-NON-CONSISTENT Message-ID: <20200910101431.GC97481@google.com> References: <20200820044347.GA4533@lst.de> <20200820052004.GA5305@lst.de> <20200820165407.GD12693@lst.de> <20200901110617.GA13232@lst.de> <20200910094921.GB97481@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org On (20/09/10 11:57), Hans Verkuil wrote: > > Perhaps, but this patch is meant to revert *all* changes relating to > V4L2_FLAG_MEMORY_NON_CONSISTENT. We don't want to have unused fields > in the public API. OK, would you prefer a squashed patch for all the kernel rollbacks and cleanups or a patch series? -ss