From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com,
jorhand@linux.microsoft.com, kitakar@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*() family of functions
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 17:32:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916143241.GL3956970@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7b81d743-736d-62d1-7072-d08759a0d5d7@gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:22:10PM +0100, Dan Scally wrote:
> On 16/09/2020 10:17, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:28:27AM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
...
> >> @@ -450,7 +455,7 @@ software_node_get_next_child(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> >> c = list_next_entry(c, entry);
> >> else
> >> c = list_first_entry(&p->children, struct swnode, entry);
> >> - return &c->fwnode;
> >> + return software_node_get(&c->fwnode);
> > This looks like a bugfix that probably should or could be backported. Could
> > you make it a separate patch, with a Fixes: tag?
> Yes, sure. That does change how some of the other code would need to
> work though if this patch were applied but not the separated one. Sorry;
> not sure what's the best way to proceed in that case. Should I just note
> that this patch depends on the prior application of the separated one?
It's easy to achieve. You may create a series of two, where the second one
dependant on the first one and first one has a Fixes tag and subject to
backport. I guess that's what Sakari meant.
> >> }
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 20:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 23:28 [PATCH v2] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*() family of functions Daniel Scally
2020-09-16 9:17 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-16 13:22 ` Dan Scally
2020-09-16 14:32 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-09-16 15:06 ` Kieran Bingham
2020-09-16 16:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-09-18 6:22 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-18 6:49 ` Dan Scally
2020-09-18 7:34 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-18 7:46 ` Dan Scally
2020-09-18 7:57 ` Sakari Ailus
[not found] ` <20200918085709.GA1630537@kuha.fi.intel.com>
2020-09-18 9:10 ` Dan Scally
2020-09-18 9:15 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-09-18 9:22 ` Dan Scally
2020-09-18 12:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916143241.GL3956970@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jorhand@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kitakar@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).