On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:22:22AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/03/2024 19:05, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 06:59:18AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 21/03/2024 21:43, Anatoliy Klymenko wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h b/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 000000000000..60fc6e11dabc
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/include/dt-bindings/media/media-bus-format.h
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
> >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR MIT) */
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Media Bus API header
> >>> + *
> >>> + * Copyright (C) 2009, Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
> >>> + *
> >>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
> >>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> >>
> >> That's not true. Your SPDX tells something entirely different.
> >>
> >> Anyway, you did not explain why you need to copy anything anywhere.
> > 
> > I assume by "copy anything anywhere" you mean "why did you copy a linux
> > uapi header into the bindings?
> 
> Yes, I trimmed context too much.
> 
> The reasoning of copying some UAPI and claiming it is a binding was:
> "Copy media-bus-formats.h into dt-bindings/media to suplement TPG DT node."
> so as seen *there is no reason*.
> 

> Commit msg should explain why we are doing things.

Oh for sure. I was just wondering if you were complaining about the UAPI
header or if that comment was about the copyright notice. If it had been
the latter I was gonna point out the former :)