From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2019 09:12:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32aff389-a4c0-3f9a-73cf-a8c5def9ea29@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001031823.312020-3-c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
On 10/1/19 5:18 AM, Jiunn Chang wrote:
> Tuner step increment/decrement will select the next highest or next
> lowest service frequency. There are a total of three possible
> frequencies given a broadcast type and system for a total of 81 analog
> channels.
>
> Opcodes implemented:
> - <Tuner Step Increment>
> - <Tuner Step Decrement>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiunn Chang <c0d1n61at3@gmail.com>
> ---
> utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp | 2 +-
> utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h | 3 +-
> utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> index 4243fdd9..8375404e 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.cpp
> @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ void state_init(struct node &node)
> node.state.sac_active = false;
> node.state.volume = 50;
> node.state.mute = false;
> - analog_tuner_init(&node.state.tuner_dev_info);
> + analog_tuner_init(&node.state);
> }
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> index a53c16fe..d8ac4e77 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-follower.h
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct state {
> unsigned rc_press_hold_count;
> unsigned rc_duration_sum;
> struct cec_op_tuner_device_info tuner_dev_info;
> + unsigned int freq_idx;
> };
>
> struct node {
> @@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ std::string opcode2s(const struct cec_msg *msg);
> void sad_encode(const struct short_audio_desc *sad, __u32 *descriptor);
>
> // cec-tuner.cpp
> -void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *tuner_dev_info);
> +void analog_tuner_init(struct state *state);
> void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, unsigned me);
>
> // CEC processing
> diff --git a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> index d74981b2..6f14b059 100644
> --- a/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> +++ b/utils/cec-follower/cec-tuner.cpp
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #include "cec-follower.h"
>
> #define NUM_ANALOG_FREQS 3
> +#define ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(x) \
> + ARRAY_SIZE(x) * ARRAY_SIZE(*x) * ARRAY_SIZE(**x)
This can be a bit easier:
#define TOT_ANALOG_FREQS (sizeof(analog_freqs_khz) / sizeof(analog_freqs_khz[0][0][0]))
>
> /*
> * This table contains analog television channel frequencies in KHz. There are
> @@ -90,10 +92,12 @@ static unsigned int analog_freqs_khz[3][9][NUM_ANALOG_FREQS] =
> }
> };
>
> -void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info)
> +void analog_tuner_init(struct state *state)
> {
> + struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &state->tuner_dev_info;
> unsigned int freq_khz;
>
> + state->freq_idx = 0;
> info->rec_flag = CEC_OP_REC_FLAG_NOT_USED;
> info->tuner_display_info = CEC_OP_TUNER_DISPLAY_INFO_ANALOGUE;
> info->is_analog = true;
> @@ -103,23 +107,41 @@ void analog_tuner_init(struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info)
> info->analog.ana_freq = (freq_khz * 10) / 625;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int analog_get_nearest_freq(__u8 ana_bcast_type, __u8 ana_bcast_system,
> - int ana_freq_khz)
> +static unsigned int analog_get_nearest_freq_idx(__u8 ana_bcast_type, __u8 ana_bcast_system,
> + int ana_freq_khz)
> {
> int nearest = analog_freqs_khz[ana_bcast_type][ana_bcast_system][0];
> + unsigned int offset = 0;
>
> for (int i = 0; i < NUM_ANALOG_FREQS; i++) {
> int freq = analog_freqs_khz[ana_bcast_type][ana_bcast_system][i];
>
> - if (abs(ana_freq_khz - freq) < abs(ana_freq_khz - nearest))
> + if (abs(ana_freq_khz - freq) < abs(ana_freq_khz - nearest)) {
> nearest = freq;
> + offset++;
This should be 'offset = i;'
> + }
> }
> - return nearest;
> + return NUM_ANALOG_FREQS * ((ana_bcast_type * 9) + ana_bcast_system) + offset;
> }
>
> -static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
> +static void analog_get_type_system_idx(struct node *node)
'get' implies that data is returned, and that's not the case here.
How about analog_update_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, unsigned int idx);
So the index is passed as an argument and this function sets state.freq_idx as well.
> {
> struct cec_op_tuner_device_info *info = &node->state.tuner_dev_info;
> + unsigned int tot_freqs = NUM_ANALOG_FREQS * 9;
> + unsigned int freq_idx = node->state.freq_idx;
> + unsigned int freq_khz;
> + unsigned int idx;
> +
> + info->analog.ana_bcast_type = freq_idx / tot_freqs;
> + info->analog.bcast_system =
> + (freq_idx - (tot_freqs * info->analog.ana_bcast_type)) / NUM_ANALOG_FREQS;
> + idx = freq_idx % NUM_ANALOG_FREQS;
> + freq_khz = analog_freqs_khz[info->analog.ana_bcast_type][info->analog.bcast_system][idx];
> + info->analog.ana_freq = (freq_khz * 10) / 625;
> +}
> +
> +static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
> +{
> __u8 type;
> __u16 freq;
> __u8 system;
> @@ -127,11 +149,9 @@ static bool analog_set_tuner_dev_info(struct node *node, struct cec_msg *msg)
> cec_ops_select_analogue_service(msg, &type, &freq, &system);
> if (type < 3 && system < 9) {
> int freq_khz = (freq * 625) / 10;
> - unsigned int nearest = analog_get_nearest_freq(type, system,
> - freq_khz);
> - info->analog.ana_bcast_type = type;
> - info->analog.ana_freq = (nearest * 10) / 625;
> - info->analog.bcast_system = system;
> +
> + node->state.freq_idx = analog_get_nearest_freq_idx(type, system, freq_khz);
> + analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
> return true;
> }
> return false;
> @@ -180,12 +200,29 @@ void process_tuner_record_timer_msgs(struct node *node, struct cec_msg &msg, uns
> return;
>
> case CEC_MSG_SELECT_DIGITAL_SERVICE:
> - case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT:
> - case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT:
> - if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me))
> + case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_DECREMENT: {
> + if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me))
> break;
> +
> + if (node->state.freq_idx == 0)
> + node->state.freq_idx = ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(analog_freqs_khz) - 1;
> + else
> + node->state.freq_idx--;
> + analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
> return;
> + }
>
> + case CEC_MSG_TUNER_STEP_INCREMENT: {
> + if (!cec_has_tuner(1 << me) && !cec_has_tv(1 << me))
> + break;
> +
> + if (node->state.freq_idx == ARRAY_SIZE_ANA_FREQS(analog_freqs_khz) - 1)
> + node->state.freq_idx = 0;
> + else
> + node->state.freq_idx++;
> + analog_get_type_system_idx(node);
> + return;
> + }
>
> /*
> One Touch Record
>
It's getting close...
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-01 7:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-24 14:17 [PATCH 0/2] cec-compliance: tuner control Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 14:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 15:20 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-24 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] cec-compliance: add/refactor tuner control tests Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 19:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] cec-compliance: tuner control Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30 4:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] " Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 " Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Jiunn Chang
2019-10-04 4:05 ` [PATCH v6 0/1] " Jiunn Chang
2019-10-04 4:05 ` [PATCH v6 1/1] Add test for new features in cec-follower Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03 3:18 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] Add test for new features in cec-follower Jiunn Chang
2019-10-03 6:51 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-10-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] cec-follower: fix bugs for tuner emulation Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01 7:12 ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2019-10-01 3:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] cec-compliance: add tuner control test Jiunn Chang
2019-10-01 7:51 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-30 4:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] cec-follower: fix bugs for tuner emulation Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30 9:12 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-30 4:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30 9:35 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-30 4:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] cec-compliance: refactor tuner control tests Jiunn Chang
2019-09-30 9:43 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-24 19:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] cec-follower: add tuner step increment/decrement Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 19:31 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Shuah Khan
2019-09-25 6:54 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-25 7:12 ` Hans Verkuil
2019-09-24 19:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cec-compliance: add/refactor tuner control tests Jiunn Chang
2019-09-24 19:44 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] " Shuah Khan
2019-09-25 7:22 ` Hans Verkuil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32aff389-a4c0-3f9a-73cf-a8c5def9ea29@xs4all.nl \
--to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=c0d1n61at3@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).