linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helen Koike <helen@koikeco.de>
To: "Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>,
	"Helen Koike" <helen.koike@collabora.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org,
	"Niklas Söderlund" <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] vimc: Join pipeline if one already exists
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 15:24:10 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3369c4f6-d08b-efca-baed-e48cca2d4d87@koikeco.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190518010744.15195-4-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>

Hi Niklas,

Thanks for the patch (and sorry for my late reply).

On 5/17/19 10:07 PM, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> A sensor which is running is already part of a pipeline and trying to
> start a new pipeline is not possible. This prevents two capture devices
> connected to the same sensor from running at the same time.
> 
> Instead of failing to start the second capture device allow it to join
> the already running pipeline by looking it up at the sensor. This allows
> two (or more) capture devices to independently be started and stopped
> while still being connected to the same sensor.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-capture.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-capture.c b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-capture.c
> index e7d0fc2228a6f0c1..f9eb1e327e311b4a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-capture.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vimc/vimc-capture.c
> @@ -264,16 +264,49 @@ static void vimc_cap_return_all_buffers(struct vimc_cap_device *vcap,
>  	spin_unlock(&vcap->qlock);
>  }
>  
> +static struct media_entity *vimc_cap_get_sensor(struct vimc_cap_device *vcap)
> +{
> +	struct media_entity *entity = &vcap->vdev.entity;
> +	struct media_device *mdev = entity->graph_obj.mdev;
> +	struct media_graph graph;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
> +	if (media_graph_walk_init(&graph, mdev)) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	media_graph_walk_start(&graph, entity);
> +
> +	while ((entity = media_graph_walk_next(&graph)))
> +		if (entity->function == MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR)
> +			break;

I was wondering if it should search up to the sensor, or if it could just search the first entity with a pipe object, what do you think?
Like this it should work with an output device instead of a sensor.

Regards,
Helen

> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
> +
> +	media_graph_walk_cleanup(&graph);
> +
> +	return entity;
> +}
> +
>  static int vimc_cap_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, unsigned int count)
>  {
>  	struct vimc_cap_device *vcap = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq);
>  	struct media_entity *entity = &vcap->vdev.entity;
> +	struct media_pipeline *pipe = NULL;
> +	struct media_entity *sensorent;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	vcap->sequence = 0;
>  
>  	/* Start the media pipeline */
> -	ret = media_pipeline_start(entity, &vcap->stream.pipe);
> +	sensorent = vimc_cap_get_sensor(vcap);
> +	if (sensorent && sensorent->pipe)
> +		pipe = sensorent->pipe;
> +	else
> +		pipe = &vcap->stream.pipe;
> +
> +	ret = media_pipeline_start(entity, pipe);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		vimc_cap_return_all_buffers(vcap, VB2_BUF_STATE_QUEUED);
>  		return ret;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-09 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-18  1:07 [PATCH 0/3] vimc: Allow multiple capture devices to use the same sensor Niklas Söderlund
2019-05-18  1:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] vimc: Add usage count to subdevices Niklas Söderlund
2020-03-16 19:40   ` Helen Koike
2020-03-16 20:32     ` Niklas Söderlund
2019-05-18  1:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] vimc: Serialize vimc_streamer_s_stream() Niklas Söderlund
2019-05-18  1:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] vimc: Join pipeline if one already exists Niklas Söderlund
2019-07-09 18:24   ` Helen Koike [this message]
2019-07-11  4:35     ` Niklas Söderlund
2019-10-23  7:01 ` [PATCH 0/3] vimc: Allow multiple capture devices to use the same sensor Hans Verkuil
2019-10-23 10:22   ` Niklas Söderlund

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3369c4f6-d08b-efca-baed-e48cca2d4d87@koikeco.de \
    --to=helen@koikeco.de \
    --cc=helen.koike@collabora.com \
    --cc=libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
    --cc=niklas.soderlund@ragnatech.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).