linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>,
	kernel@collabora.com, Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@chromium.org>,
	Jeffrey Kardatzke <jkardatzke@chromium.org>,
	Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Paul Kocialkowski <paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] media: uapi: h264: Further clarify scaling lists order
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:44:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39819dcc-a336-3d13-38ab-93a27460e103@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e61d98bd8d7a6d41daf0edd449bd27558c0ac16.camel@collabora.com>

On 16/07/2020 13:43, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-16 at 09:23 +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
>> On 15/07/2020 22:22, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>>> Commit 0b0393d59eb4a ("media: uapi: h264: clarify
>>> expected scaling_list_4x4/8x8 order") improved the
>>> documentation on H264 scaling lists order.
>>>
>>> This commit improves the documentation by clarifying
>>> that the lists themselves are expected in matrix order.
>>
>> "matrix order" is not a well defined term. Especially since different
>> programming languages lay out matrices differently (e.g. fortran uses
>> column-major order). Perhaps something like this is more unambiguous:
>>
> 
> Agreed, "matrix order" is perhaps not a proper choice of words.
> 
>> "The values on each scaling list are in row-major order."
>>
>> BTW, why not be explicit and use:
>>
>> __u8 scaling_list_4x4[6][4][4];
>> __u8 scaling_list_8x8[6][8][8];
>>
>> That makes it explicit and the order is just that of what the C language
>> uses.
>>
> 
> I am not sure if that'll go in clearer direction.
> 
> I'm thinking we just need to clarify the coefficients
> are in raster scan order, as opposed to a zig-zag scan
> order, which is a part of the decoding process.
> 
> How about we simply say "raster scan order" and keep the patch as is?

That works for me.

Regards,

	Hans

> 
> Thanks,
> Ezequiel
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>>
>> 	Hans
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst | 6 ++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
>>> index c2e17c02f77e..16bfc98ab2f6 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/ext-ctrls-codec.rst
>>> @@ -1725,12 +1725,14 @@ enum v4l2_mpeg_video_h264_hierarchical_coding_type -
>>>        - ``scaling_list_4x4[6][16]``
>>>        - Scaling matrix after applying the inverse scanning process.
>>>          Expected list order is Intra Y, Intra Cb, Intra Cr, Inter Y,
>>> -        Inter Cb, Inter Cr.
>>> +        Inter Cb, Inter Cr. The values on each scaling list are
>>> +        expected in matrix order.
>>>      * - __u8
>>>        - ``scaling_list_8x8[6][64]``
>>>        - Scaling matrix after applying the inverse scanning process.
>>>          Expected list order is Intra Y, Inter Y, Intra Cb, Inter Cb,
>>> -        Intra Cr, Inter Cr.
>>> +        Intra Cr, Inter Cr. The values on each scaling list are
>>> +        expected in matrix order.
>>>  
>>>  ``V4L2_CID_MPEG_VIDEO_H264_SLICE_PARAMS (struct)``
>>>      Specifies the slice parameters (as extracted from the bitstream)
>>>
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-16 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-15 20:22 [PATCH 0/7] media: Clean H264 stateless uAPI Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 01/10] media: uapi: h264: Update reference lists Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-22 21:43   ` Jonas Karlman
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 02/10] media: uapi: h264: Further clarify scaling lists order Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-16  7:23   ` Hans Verkuil
2020-07-16 11:43     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-16 11:44       ` Hans Verkuil [this message]
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 03/10] media: uapi: h264: Split prediction weight parameters Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-16  7:26   ` Hans Verkuil
2020-07-16 11:14     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-22 16:03   ` Jernej Škrabec
2020-07-25 13:30   ` Alexandre Courbot
2020-07-30 13:48     ` Nicolas Dufresne
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 04/10] media: uapi: h264: Clarify pic_order_cnt_bit_size field Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 05/10] media: uapi: h264: Increase size of 'first_mb_in_slice' field Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 06/10] media: uapi: h264: Cleanup DPB entry interface Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-22 16:09   ` Jernej Škrabec
2020-07-22 17:11     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-22 21:52   ` Jonas Karlman
2020-07-24 19:08     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-27 23:39       ` Jonas Karlman
2020-07-31 12:49         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 07/10] media: uapi: h264: Increase size of DPB entry pic_num Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 08/10] media: uapi: h264: Clean slice invariants syntax elements Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-25 14:34   ` Alexandre Courbot
2020-07-27 14:39     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-27 14:52       ` Tomasz Figa
2020-07-27 16:18         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-27 18:10           ` Tomasz Figa
2020-07-27 19:43             ` Nicolas Dufresne
2020-08-04 13:35               ` Tomasz Figa
2020-08-05 16:41                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-28 12:44       ` Maxime Ripard
2020-07-28 21:09         ` Nicolas Dufresne
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 09/10] media: hantro: Don't require unneeded H264_SLICE_PARAMS Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-25 14:45   ` Alexandre Courbot
2020-07-26 13:34     ` Alexandre Courbot
2020-07-27 14:44     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-15 20:22 ` [PATCH 10/10] media: rkvdec: " Ezequiel Garcia
2020-07-27 22:03   ` Jonas Karlman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39819dcc-a336-3d13-38ab-93a27460e103@xs4all.nl \
    --to=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=acourbot@chromium.org \
    --cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
    --cc=jkardatzke@chromium.org \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
    --cc=tfiga@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).