From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1127C76188 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C735221849 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 11:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727994AbfGSL6c (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:58:32 -0400 Received: from quake1.xnet.com ([198.147.221.67]:63927 "EHLO quake1.xnet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726072AbfGSL6c (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:58:32 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 499 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 07:58:27 EDT Received: from [192.168.2.5] (c-98-213-182-234.hsd1.il.comcast.net [98.213.182.234]) by quake1.xnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26B9B44 for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:50:07 -0500 (CDT) To: linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: JohnG Subject: scancodes identified as invalid Message-ID: <5370cd2b-f699-7831-e040-4b27e7f0cdaa@xnet.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 06:50:05 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org I have POWER_KEY scancodes, that work as RAW data with ir-ctl -s [file], but are not working with ir-ctl -S:     0x20df10ef (POWER_KEY for my LG tv)     0x02FD48B7 (POWER_KEY for my Toshiba tv) rc6_mce:0x800f0410 works, as does nec32:0x800f0410 (though not nec:0x800f0410), so it doesn't seem to be an issue with 32-bit codes. I use AnalysIR, and it indicates the protocol is NEC for the above codes, though irdb.tk indicates the protocol is NEC1. 1) is there a description of the various protocols? (how can I know if I should use nec or nec32, with a 32 bit value?) 2) are my scancodes failing to work, because they are (possibly) NEC1 protocol? 3) if NEC1 is not the same as nec or nec32, is it scheduled to be added to ir-ctl in the near future? JohnG