From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112EBC3A589 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34252133F for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2019 01:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="MveWE7gF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726390AbfHPBFE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:05:04 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f196.google.com ([209.85.215.196]:35340 "EHLO mail-pg1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725983AbfHPBFE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:05:04 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f196.google.com with SMTP id n4so2095737pgv.2 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:05:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x4CzuWcgunsZJs+WYtr2EuoxYtu+dTksDOtb4J/UCQ4=; b=MveWE7gFch9wflVEiO2qb4wNdP/Ge3Vlm/wvUUhrS8vBjEdsOt1u8AsuDXzmqdKTE+ qeR0s22cQsERNNPRLw+JORQ62R3T/YO7WhZvyOSbn7owfybLO6cPgQhmzDc4aYWjg27J 8lJ4GBgN59/IgPeJpgH3VqtDgcFcvGb3KDVzNx09+dwNM2TZrHYdk9R3bZtN15rl3PPC wN/onXY/HyeCTkxPGnNDzqLnsbzdNCFvfb99F7v8DV6NPo+X/rTxzySNklAeCpoab1Rr iPmEHDeUpwoVtcnu9XMo3Y1PKJ3Yn2Vh7em+iGYCHPqMYLyhnGKz9+Yc7XmX4XV/UlMs 1vZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=x4CzuWcgunsZJs+WYtr2EuoxYtu+dTksDOtb4J/UCQ4=; b=Y9N5+lLlblOTucWQZJ4hHMsKA9vJdhwLDuYFV7sy4jr7Mu49oYaR3cp7G1TusGxAfI MQ1ME9J+cx5noqjnpWHKii+iNzqU4JhDGeK9S9SaxIc1mkfJJPCpfMOUyPitaIE9YDgz LMpbEeuvgZ0mJ2OZgsvxEi83Z36ZL/0pgHQ+2cDJaanFbxgwx3aL2IC7RMQ2ovSIkp3v +Lg7IEIWmRBOU8hcmE6OGKMQcuyw6XPadtJvITsJHYaaLHZJ94Uib83vyF+R8EBU5dGK FTAHB7NywEc18BSiQ0otOOrrBCFTna5wmUW2PRjfTrgmwYNQlRUYX3miMqeVKjbF2j8W vMGw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWNdBk/yn2ieo2bU+yBzMK/YaWLfGE8PWYSg9BBXhzZWek4Z50s wapMoqj53wz68fW3/df5vbU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxijyLDWeojklGuekPg7cBgUDjoP+ludZ4sS6o8tRJx8SSCYSsfSBvSV9G3I29yplA811sMLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:23d0:: with SMTP id g74mr4854832pje.115.1565917503338; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.4] (softbank219203027033.bbtec.net. [219.203.27.33]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z63sm3719077pfb.98.2019.08.15.18.05.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 18:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] dvb-usb-v2/gl861: fix wrong memcpy To: Hans Verkuil , Linux Media Mailing List Cc: Antti Palosaari , Sean Young , Mauro Carvalho Chehab References: <98cb0a1c-0db8-951b-80e1-12756678db9a@xs4all.nl> From: Akihiro TSUKADA Message-ID: <6c2806fe-f104-84bf-21b8-21df9b3112cf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:04:59 +0900 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <98cb0a1c-0db8-951b-80e1-12756678db9a@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US-large Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > Does anyone have this hardware? This device must have been dead for about > a year, ever since commit b30cc07de8a9 was merged. I have one. (and I wrote the patch). Since I do not use it regularly and my app did not use the return value meaningfully, I have not noticed. regards, Akihiro