linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
	hverkuil@xs4all.nl, linux-imx@nxp.com,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: imx: mipi csi-2: Don't fail if initial state times-out
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2019 12:27:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ab6280c-9d23-d2d0-bd11-ff5f53785356@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4b84958-28c7-1141-e34f-e1e3ad5b35db@gmail.com>



On 8/8/19 11:02 AM, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>
>
> On 8/8/19 1:53 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Hi Sakari,
>>
>> On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 11:26 +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>> Have you checked how it works if you simply leave out this test?
>> Whether this works or not depends on the sensor used, and for some
>> sensor/drivers may depend on timing (or random factors influencing it).
>> See below.
>>
>> [...]
>>> Some devices can be commanded to enter LP-11 state but some will just
>>> briefly visit that state. The LP-11 state is mandatory but software 
>>> should
>>> not be involved in detecting it if at all possible.
>> This is a good point. Devices that can be set to LP-11 state
>> immediately, but that don't stay there long enough (either because they
>> wait for less than the required by spec 100µs, or because system load
>> causes this check to be executed too late) may end up working reliably
>> even though the warning fires.
>
>>> So if the hardware does not require further initialisation to be 
>>> done in
>>> LP-11 state, you should remove the check.
>>>
>>>> We had to fix at least OV5645 and OV5640 recently because of this,
>>>> and I can imagine more drivers will have the same issue.
>>> This is actually an issue in the IMX driver (or hardware), not in the
>>> sensor driver. It may be that sometimes it's easier to work around 
>>> it in
>>> the sensor driver.
>>>
>>> So, I'd like to know whether the check itself is a driver bug, or 
>>> something
>>> that the hardware requires. The fact that you're sending this patch
>>> suggests the former.
>> This is something that the hardware requires, according to the reference
>> manual. See the comment in drivers/staging/media/imx/imx6-mipi-csi2.c,
>> especially step 5.:
>>
>> /*
>>   * The required sequence of MIPI CSI-2 startup as specified in the 
>> i.MX6
>>   * reference manual is as follows:
>>   *
>>   * 1. Deassert presetn signal (global reset).
>>   *        It's not clear what this "global reset" signal is (maybe APB
>>   *        global reset), but in any case this step would be probably
>>   *        be carried out during driver load in csi2_probe().
>>   *
>>   * 2. Configure MIPI Camera Sensor to put all Tx lanes in LP-11 state.
>>   *        This must be carried out by the MIPI sensor's s_power(ON) 
>> subdev
>>   *        op.
>>   *
>>   * 3. D-PHY initialization.
>>   * 4. CSI2 Controller programming (Set N_LANES, deassert PHY_SHUTDOWNZ,
>>   *    deassert PHY_RSTZ, deassert CSI2_RESETN).
>>   * 5. Read the PHY status register (PHY_STATE) to confirm that all 
>> data and
>>   *    clock lanes of the D-PHY are in LP-11 state.
>>   * 6. Configure the MIPI Camera Sensor to start transmitting a clock 
>> on the
>>   *    D-PHY clock lane.
>>   * 7. CSI2 Controller programming - Read the PHY status register 
>> (PHY_STATE)
>>   *    to confirm that the D-PHY is receiving a clock on the D-PHY 
>> clock lane.
>>   */
>>
>> I read this as the hardware needing to see the LP-11 -> HS transition
>> after the DPHY reset has been released, and before the CSI2 RX
>> controller is programmed.
>
> I think that's a fair assumption, and there's another paragraph at the 
> end of that comment above that adds more evidence to that:
>
> ...
> * All steps 3 through 7 are carried out by csi2_s_stream(ON) here. Step
> * 6 is accomplished by calling the source subdev's s_stream(ON) between
> * steps 5 and 7.
> */
>
>
> So the driver is expecting that the LP-11 state persists until step 6, 
> at which the LP-11 -> HS transition occurs when streaming is started 
> at the transmitter.
>
> But if the transmitter only stays in LP-11 state for the minimum 100 
> usec after it is powered on, and then _automatically_ transitions to 
> HS, it's quite possible the LP-11 -> HS transition will happen long 
> before the DPHY is taken out of reset. That's because the 
> transmitter's s_power(ON) is called when the capture device is opened 
> (via v4l2_pipeline_pm_use()), but the steps above are carried out when 
> streaming starts, so userland would have to issue VIDIOC_STREAMON well 
> within the 100 usec expires after open()'ing the device, for the 
> receiver hardware to see the transition.
>
> Perhaps that would be an argument for moving steps 1 - 5 into the 
> driver's s_power(ON) call, which would first call s_power(ON) to the 
> transmitter and then immediately go through steps 1 - 5. Steps 6,7 
> would then remain in s_stream(ON).

Well, after more testing on the i.MX6q SabreSD with the MIPI CSI-2 
OV5640, this looks like an advisable thing to do. I will submit a patch.

Steve


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-10 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-27 22:29 [PATCH v3] media: imx: mipi csi-2: Don't fail if initial state times-out Fabio Estevam
2019-06-28  1:28 ` Steve Longerbeam
2019-07-01  6:48 ` Philipp Zabel
2019-07-30  8:14   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-08-07 12:06     ` Sakari Ailus
2019-08-07 13:59       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2019-08-08  8:26         ` Sakari Ailus
2019-08-08  8:53           ` Philipp Zabel
2019-08-08 10:18             ` Sakari Ailus
2019-08-08 18:02             ` Steve Longerbeam
2019-08-10 19:27               ` Steve Longerbeam [this message]
2019-08-13  8:28               ` Sakari Ailus
2019-08-13 23:27                 ` Steve Longerbeam
2019-08-14  7:16                   ` Sakari Ailus
2019-08-15 20:25                     ` Steve Longerbeam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ab6280c-9d23-d2d0-bd11-ff5f53785356@gmail.com \
    --to=slongerbeam@gmail.com \
    --cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@iki.fi \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).