From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E251C3A5A0 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6CFC21744 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 20:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="epMez4Fb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726738AbgDTUDP (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:03:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46462 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728231AbgDTUDN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:03:13 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16C7C061A0F for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:03:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id d7so9968299oif.9 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:03:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=pkPZ7h9fC8BsOerRtlvvnGLGiIv/zlO9wzpVyiPuKMc=; b=epMez4Fb+Up3S68NxnNFOnpWEwXbOSZwcG9xUal/jTDNtl0iDX0wvM5AwLgguZaKk2 VYiybnTi3K8r0kl1VPunCd4l2bsjDbbKTzFmV1hgY2nOq/gsbdPWi7WojRJ+V6X/rzI3 4ZQNYR9i+OPhgunhzWKNyCGbB4XPliIPsiItVM7mu3ewb1H1TAmJ1rVPxEhBr8s3VS18 iNYMMgqi30l7tdT7l0HAlR1GysStmNhd18nwLoNUx3H4B/4f9jhLdR9Fn6CS4gz2TS6B 0nrFlUVXbZVSJNeFvvPSzvXcUAGTrzGa9Xe5yMq4DFw/GTN5OEgwAiMLSjCRbN/7BT5n Md1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=pkPZ7h9fC8BsOerRtlvvnGLGiIv/zlO9wzpVyiPuKMc=; b=geaCHHwP0WtiTWkKTMP9Td6rPHca6dUjWVlVSSV45qrW6ztnFWc7Pnt39Q6tiL0A0R nDApbIllNmcxCSIq3N4DI273SskwFszUIiQzJ17OjJt6B+slZdOHDtg/8YznZRpV5QOR DvixBZgaD7Bg8acHj/mKMHEm81n5vDz2D5xz5SL/s1a6zJOVYW/EtwZlUUKu4zRmGa6x 7MrERa9MCptpWj4aEULUXFVQdZRCUUTKdNvbqwSBX2shC6lZz/XJDBAa4sZmXwsLSusp uRMeEFDRp7Og6ORIYnf8kVQi5QbK/knoz93FzMSEvt0rsBPz+LTuACoIMmNmh2MFmoh3 Nk7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYs7Dxsk3301oMDIluWoBMHLIc4TMPQJhOOGxKBPPnoy9a6cUjE 609WmozPUesqD5ZvTDzZlE9c5+jIP3bijiuj5uQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIwVI9p4MlBEyhyixaqkXiOCrtfwwoAxrfYr78XacAYYcYpXHd5Bvtvjn31sF8pY4LFI/+4l+vg7yswC53Kbsw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:3d5:: with SMTP id o21mr869258oie.40.1587412991962; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:03:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <818465d4-3665-5af0-0136-2090edbb4eb1@googlemail.com> <20200420121942.GA22485@gofer.mess.org> In-Reply-To: <20200420121942.GA22485@gofer.mess.org> From: Rosen Penev Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:03:00 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How about a v4l-utils-1.20 release? To: Sean Young Cc: Gregor Jasny , Hans Verkuil , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Media Mailing List , "Ariel D'Alessandro" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-media-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-media@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 5:19 AM Sean Young wrote: > > Hi Gregor, > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 02:05:07PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote: > > Hello, > > > > It's been a while since we released v4l-utils 1.18. How about a 1.20 > > release? > > > > Do you have anything that should go in before? > > There is nothing from me. There are few patches on the list from Rosen Penev, > cleaning up various stuff found with clang. I have two more series to send. One of the previous patches introduced a regression where it cannot be compiled with C++98 (no std::lround). > > Otherwise I guess there is the meson build system, but I don't know how far > out that is. meson is pretty useful as far as running clang-tidy is concerned. Otherwise, it works fine. > > Thanks, > > Sean