From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
Cc: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se, geert@linux-m68k.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Replace goto with a loop
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 03:05:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YDMDPymgU/N5wd/i@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c95022bc-3841-4d0a-653c-6d6974e20355@ideasonboard.com>
Hi Jacopo,
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 01:01:26PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 16/02/2021 17:41, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > During the camera module initialization the image sensor PID is read to
> > verify it can correctly be identified. The current implementation is
> > rather confused and uses a loop implemented with a label and a goto.
> >
> > Replace it with a more compact for() loop.
> >
> > No functional changes intended.
>
> I think there is a functional change in here, but I almost like it.
>
> Before, if the read was successful, it would check to see if the
> OV10635_PID == OV10635_VERSION, and if not it would print that the read
> was successful but a mismatch.
>
> Now - it will retry again instead, and if at the end of the retries it
> still fails then it's a failure.
>
> This means we perhaps don't get told if the device id is not correct in
> the same way, but it also means that if the VERSION was not correct
> because of a read error (which I believe i've seen occur), it will retry.
I was going to ask about that, whether we can have a successful I2C read
operation that would return incorrect data. If we do, aren't we screwed
? If there's a non-negligible probability that reads will return
incorrect data without any way to know about it (for other registers
than the version register of course), then I would consider that writes
could fail the same way, and that would mean an unusable device,
wouldn't it ?
If, on the other hand, read failures can always (or nearly always,
ignoring space neutrinos and similar niceties) be detected, then I think
we should avoid the functional change.
> Because there is a functional change you might want to update the
> commit, but I still think this is a good change overall.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
> > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > index 4d9bac87cba8..6504ed0bd3bc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/rdacm20.c
> > @@ -59,6 +59,8 @@
> > */
> > #define OV10635_PIXEL_RATE (44000000)
> >
> > +#define OV10635_PID_TIMEOUT 3
> > +
> > static const struct ov10635_reg {
> > u16 reg;
> > u8 val;
> > @@ -452,7 +454,7 @@ static const struct v4l2_subdev_ops rdacm20_subdev_ops = {
> >
> > static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev)
> > {
> > - unsigned int retry = 3;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > int ret;
> >
> > /* Verify communication with the MAX9271: ping to wakeup. */
> > @@ -501,23 +503,14 @@ static int rdacm20_initialize(struct rdacm20_device *dev)
> > return ret;
> > usleep_range(10000, 15000);
> >
> > -again:
> > - ret = ov10635_read16(dev, OV10635_PID);
> > - if (ret < 0) {
> > - if (retry--)
> > - goto again;
> > -
> > - dev_err(dev->dev, "OV10635 ID read failed (%d)\n",
> > - ret);
> > - return -ENXIO;
> > + for (i = 0; i < OV10635_PID_TIMEOUT; ++i) {
> > + ret = ov10635_read16(dev, OV10635_PID);
> > + if (ret == OV10635_VERSION)
> > + break;
> > + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
> > }
> > -
> > - if (ret != OV10635_VERSION) {
> > - if (retry--)
> > - goto again;
> > -
> > - dev_err(dev->dev, "OV10635 ID mismatch (0x%04x)\n",
> > - ret);
> > + if (i == OV10635_PID_TIMEOUT) {
> > + dev_err(dev->dev, "OV10635 ID read failed (%d)\n", ret);
> > return -ENXIO;
> > }
> >
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-22 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-16 17:41 [PATCH 00/16] media: i2c: GMSL reliability improvements Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 01/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Enable noise immunity Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 12:55 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 0:49 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-22 14:59 ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-24 20:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 02/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Embedded 'serializer' field Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 12:56 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 0:58 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 03/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Replace goto with a loop Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 13:01 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:05 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2021-02-22 15:06 ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-24 20:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-25 8:56 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 04/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Report camera module name Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 13:02 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 05/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Check return values Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 13:08 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:09 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-22 15:08 ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 06/16] media: i2c: rdacm20: Re-work ov10635 reset Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 13:22 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 07/16] media: i2c: rdacm2x: Fix wake up delay Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 8:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-17 13:33 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-22 15:11 ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-24 20:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 08/16] media: i2c: max9286: Adjust parameters indent Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 13:36 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:20 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 09/16] media: i2c: rdacm21: Re-work OV10640 initialization Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 8:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-17 13:55 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-22 15:19 ` Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-24 20:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 10/16] media: i2c: max9286: Rename reverse_channel_mv Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 8:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-18 15:06 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 11/16] media: i2c: max9286: Cache channel amplitude Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 8:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-18 15:39 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:33 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 12/16] media: i2c: max9286: Define high " Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-18 15:39 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 13/16] media: i2c: rdacm2x: Implement .init() subdev op Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 8:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-18 16:13 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 1:52 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 14/16] media: i2c: max9286: Initialize remotes when bound Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 8:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-18 16:00 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 2:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 15/16] media: i2c: max9286: Rework comments in .bound() Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-18 16:03 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-16 17:41 ` [PATCH 16/16] media: i2c: gmsl: Use 339Kbps I2C bit-rate Jacopo Mondi
2021-02-17 8:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-02-18 16:07 ` Kieran Bingham
2021-02-22 2:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YDMDPymgU/N5wd/i@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).