Hi Dave, some questions. On Mon, 2020-05-04 at 12:25 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > From: Dave Stevenson > > With the vc-sm-cma driver we can support zero copy of buffers between > the kernel and VPU. Add this support to vchiq-mmal. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson > > staging: vc-sm-cma: Use a void* pointer as the handle within the kernel > > The driver was using an unsigned int as the handle to the outside world, > and doing a nasty cast to the struct dmabuf when handed it back. > This breaks badly with a 64 bit kernel where the pointer doesn't fit > in an unsigned int. > > Switch to using a void* within the kernel. Reality is that it is > a struct dma_buf*, but advertising it as such to other drivers seems > to encourage the use of it as such, and I'm not sure on the implications > of that. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi > --- [...] > @@ -419,8 +422,13 @@ buffer_from_host(struct vchiq_mmal_instance *instance, > > /* buffer header */ > m.u.buffer_from_host.buffer_header.cmd = 0; > - m.u.buffer_from_host.buffer_header.data = > - (u32)(unsigned long)buf->buffer; > + if (port->zero_copy) { > + m.u.buffer_from_host.buffer_header.data = buf->vc_handle; > + } else { > + m.u.buffer_from_host.buffer_header.data = > + (u32)(unsigned long)buf->buffer; > + } Just for my education, where exactly does the copying happen, IIUC this headers are copied into a vchiq slot and then it's up to vc4 to do whatever it pleases with the buffer. Also, what happens while importing a dmabuf on vc4's side and why is the buffer import needed before queueing this? Regards, Nicolas