linux-media.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: JP <jp@jpvw.nl>
To: Frantisek Rysanek <Frantisek.Rysanek@post.cz>,
	Vincent McIntyre <vincent.mcintyre@gmail.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regression(?) in cxusb
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 21:10:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec794150-9b37-4651-9a65-52a74e1ab489@jpvw.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5D8BAF97.227.3E39A624@Frantisek.Rysanek.post.cz>



On 9/25/19 8:19 PM, Frantisek Rysanek wrote:
> On 25 Sep 2019 at 20:31, Vincent McIntyre wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am seeing strange behaviour with the dvb-usb-cxusb.ko module.
>> Things have been working fine until just recently.
>>
>> Target system is Ubuntu 16.04 LTS on amd64.
>> I am using their 'hwe' kernel series.
>>
>> Symptoms:
>>   * linux-image-4.15.0-58-generic + media-build from a few weeks ago works
>> fine
>>   * linux-image-4.15.0-64-generic without media-build works fine
>>   * linux-image-4.15.0-64-generic + media build fails
> ...
>> insmod
>> /lib/modules/4.15.0-64-generic/kernel/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-common.ko
>> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'dvb_usb_cxusb': Exec format error
>>
> Dear Vincent, I'm not a maitainer, just a fellow user who happens to
> keep an eye on this list.
> Excuse my somewhat off topic response:
>
> Would you consider compiling a fresh kernel?
> What hardware are you trying to use with the cxusb driver?
>
> The linux-media subsystem is pretty vibrant and fast-paced,
> fairly serious changes happen between vanilla kernel releases.
> In that context, 4.15 sounds oldish...
>
> In the recent past, I recall support for the Mygica "T230C v2" (aka
> T230C2) moving from cxusb.c to dvbsky.c, plus a debate about
> one or two unrelated fixes to that code (maybe one of them was a
> revert of a previous patch). I recall that one of the motivations for
> T230C2 to move from cxusb.c to dvbsky.c was better support for its IR
> sensor.
> I believe this stuff will be present in Linux 5.4 (just pulled into
> the vanilla master, within the merge window that's just now open),
> possibly hasn't made it into 5.3.
> Meanwhile, the directory structure of the source code keeps receiving
> "janitoring" changes etc...
> => I suggest that you test some newer kernel, possibly betatest some
> 5.4-pre/rc to see if those make a difference (if you cannot wait a
> few weeks for 5.4.0 release). Or try some 5.2 / 5.3 if you believe
> that the recent changes to cxusb/dvbsky are irrelevant to your HW.
>
> Frank Rysanek
>
>
Hi Vincent, Frank,

  Could be Ubuntu specific or quite possibly some corruption on local 
system.

Jan Pieter.

      reply	other threads:[~2019-09-25 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAEsFdVN99i0QV7eCVtxPYKcpjJTC=k+U7eoDQvhGGKKQyM5vqQ@mail.gmail.com>
2019-09-25 10:31 ` regression(?) in cxusb Vincent McIntyre
2019-09-25 10:32   ` Vincent McIntyre
2019-09-25 18:19   ` Frantisek Rysanek
2019-09-25 19:10     ` JP [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ec794150-9b37-4651-9a65-52a74e1ab489@jpvw.nl \
    --to=jp@jpvw.nl \
    --cc=Frantisek.Rysanek@post.cz \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.mcintyre@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).