Re: [PATCH v8 4/5] rtc: mt6397: Add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC

[Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>]

On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:40 +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> From: Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com>
> 
> This add support for the MediaTek MT6358 RTC. Driver using
> compatible data to store different RTC_WRTGR address offset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ran Bi <ran.bi@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c       | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
>  include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> index 5249fc9..a90735e1 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-mt6397.c
> @@ -9,18 +9,31 @@
>  #include <linux/mfd/mt6397/core.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
>  #include <linux/rtc.h>
>  #include <linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h>
>  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>  
> +static const struct of_device_id mt6397_rtc_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6323-rtc",
> +		.data = (void *)&mt6397_rtc_data, },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6358-rtc",
> +		.data = (void *)&mt6358_rtc_data, },
> +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6397-rtc",
> +		.data = (void *)&mt6397_rtc_data, },
> +	{}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mt6397_rtc_of_match);
> +
>  static int mtk_rtc_write_trigger(struct mt6397_rtc *rtc)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  	u32 data;
>  
> -	ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap, rtc->addr_base + RTC_WRTGR, 1);
> +	ret = regmap_write(rtc->regmap,
> +			   rtc->addr_base + rtc->data->wrtgr, 1);

nit: fit in one line.

<...>

> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> index f84b916..fffe34a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/mt6397/rtc.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@
>  #define RTC_BBPU_CBUSY         BIT(6)
>  #define RTC_BBPU_KEY            (0x43 << 8)
>  
> -#define RTC_WRTGR              0x003c
> +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6358       0x3a
> +#define RTC_WRTGR_MT6397       0x3c
>  
>  #define RTC_IRQ_STA            0x0002
>  #define RTC_IRQ_STA_AL         BIT(0)
> @@ -57,6 +58,10 @@
>  #define MTK_RTC_POLL_DELAY_US  10
>  #define MTK_RTC_POLL_TIMEOUT   (jiffies_to_usecs(HZ))
>  
> +struct mtk_rtc_data {
> +	u32			wrtgr;
> +};
> +
>  struct mt6397_rtc {
>  	struct device           *dev;
>  	struct rtc_device       *rtc_dev;
> @@ -66,6 +71,15 @@ struct mt6397_rtc {
>  	struct regmap           *regmap;
>  	int                     irq;
>  	u32                     addr_base;
> +	const struct mtk_rtc_data *data;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mtk_rtc_data mt6358_rtc_data = {
> +	.wrtgr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6358,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct mtk_rtc_data mt6397_rtc_data = {
> +	.wrtgr = RTC_WRTGR_MT6397,
>  };

Hi,

Putting these in header file doesn't looks right to me.
Who need this? can you move them back to rtc-mt6397.c?

Joe.C


_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek