From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7531C35647 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8EF124656 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ZAjVIiCB"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mediatek.com header.i=@mediatek.com header.b="u3AJW8nL" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B8EF124656 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=mediatek.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=8njiF1SAqMxmiR7wTVIypUj7j5/F747903adg5XIW70=; b=ZAjVIiCBocYg08 5JnVWSxNu+tOF2BdpXSaEShbOAweND7MrWNscNd8jZSLypKf4AlCkZf0hc/VtrD7IL5oAIZx9kn8n MPh/M3+95Tbvh+SHpie/6Qtvqgcg29PTNvtVVzKLKRLmkvQWJEZVaM6gKJKMd9DEwv7xZ7ZuH01QJ ursKjqnNX73Gmjd7D59oEA/L4GjEP+LghAOBf90CP1bfeCKqgXOKr8iOGFaLqg0qMj2O1K/AO30rr t7HW/iOMzHHQrjgXVWiUhzNgI3e3DYSvona1TYIm2cdQfhPG+fuNFqgCuGiJxfi6L4G8wptrB/TcO aE+8xjrDrQUbtsCGIdfg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j55cu-0003lF-8L; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:33:44 +0000 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([216.200.240.184]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j55cj-0003c4-EB; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:33:34 +0000 X-UUID: b25c21c3736e4ecf9c580e5eb5460010-20200221 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mediatek.com; s=dk; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:CC:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=9GF943aZdupXgIlWbr1tM9dp52aP/OtDRXFu16nBKsU=; b=u3AJW8nLcjG4YYRvG+aYOWurkYxWQrMb9Q6bFv2Edoq+9llIMsJn3ZjZP1011vNZw8o8HfizgaiksK29NQHvWSrBXZmQSCiaGDUxvmDf4rt8TseCiGDJ/AwhFqr4hx7pBArZk9p0VLI8Mue2K47ZgRYPcIjcWiACtcBsR/g1h+Q=; X-UUID: b25c21c3736e4ecf9c580e5eb5460010-20200221 Received: from mtkcas66.mediatek.inc [(172.29.193.44)] by mailgw01.mediatek.com (envelope-from ) (musrelay.mediatek.com ESMTP with TLS) with ESMTP id 1675544727; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 02:33:31 -0800 Received: from mtkmbs08n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.56) by MTKMBS62N1.mediatek.inc (172.29.193.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 02:23:58 -0800 Received: from mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.84) by mtkmbs08n2.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:22:46 +0800 Received: from [172.21.77.33] (172.21.77.33) by mtkcas07.mediatek.inc (172.21.101.73) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1395.4 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:22:44 +0800 Message-ID: <1582280608.19053.27.camel@mtkswgap22> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Add basic SoC support for mt6765 From: Macpaul Lin To: Stephen Boyd Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 18:23:28 +0800 In-Reply-To: <158213769281.184098.14491216159423631295@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <1581067250-12744-1-git-send-email-macpaul.lin@mediatek.com> <158155109134.184098.10100489231587620578@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <1581999138.19053.21.camel@mtkswgap22> <2c6728a5-7789-4ca2-a173-67df57fe5f1e@gmail.com> <158213769281.184098.14491216159423631295@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-TM-SNTS-SMTP: FDD232F52A5E189BADF5D5BF6B5B255DDCAC9D3340344A6748231A437ADA98A62000:8 X-MTK: N X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200221_023333_485220_CEBABCB3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Mediatek WSD Upstream , Catalin Marinas , Michael Turquette , Loda Chou , Fabien Parent , Mars Cheng , Will Deacon , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Ryder Lee , Weiyi Lu , Evan Green , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Chunfeng Yun , mtk01761 , Owen Chen , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel , Marc Zyngier , Sean Wang , Rob Herring , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Matthias Brugger , Yong Wu , CC Hwang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Guo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Quoting Matthias Brugger and Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Matthias Brugger (2020-02-18 08:45:42) > > > > On 18/02/2020 05:12, Macpaul Lin wrote: > > > On Sat, 2020-02-15 at 02:47 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > > > > > Hi Stephen, > > > > > >> Hi Stephen, > > >> > > >> On 13/02/2020 00:44, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > >>> Quoting Macpaul Lin (2020-02-07 01:20:43) > > >>>> This patch adds basic SoC support for Mediatek's new 8-core SoC, > > >>>> MT6765, which is mainly for smartphone application. > > >>> > > >>> Clock patches look OK to me. Can you resend them without the defconfig > > >>> and dts patches and address Matthias' question? > > >>> > > >> > > >> I'm not sure if I understand you. Do you prefer to have just the clock parts > > >> send as an independent version so that you can easier apply the patches to your > > >> tree? > > >> > > >> Patch 2, 5, 6 and 7 should go through my tree. > > >> So do you want a series with patches 1, 3 and 4? > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> Matthias > > > > > > Yup, I've got a little bit confused, too. > > > Should I separate and resend these patches into 2 patch sets? > > > The 1st patch set includes #1, #3, and #4? > > > And the other includes #2, #5, #6, and #7? > > > > > > > Yes please do so. I think that's what Stephen referred to. > > > > If those are the ones that aren't dts or defconfig patches sounds good > to me. Here comes the spilt patch sets. 1. [New] Add basic clock support for mt6765. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11395997/ 2. [PATCH v8] Add basic SoC support for mt6765 https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11396019/ But it's a little bit strange I cannot find patch v8's cover-letter in patchwork. Only records which patches has been taken from v7. If resend cover-letter is required please let me know. Regards, Macpaul Lin _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek