linux-mediatek.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Cc: qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com, ryder.lee@mediatek.com,
	jianjun.wang@mediatek.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
	kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com,
	pali@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, alyssa@rosenzweig.io,
	luca@lucaceresoli.net
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] PCI: mediatek: Delay 100ms to wait power and clock to become stable
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 22:12:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211208041228.GA103736@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d3cb32527f48df70@bloch.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 10:00:43PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 11:54:16 -0600
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
> > 
> > [+cc Marc, Alyssa, Mark, Luca for reset timing questions]
> 
> Hi Bjorn,
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:41:53PM +0800, qizhong cheng wrote:
> > > Described in PCIe CEM specification sections 2.2 (PERST# Signal) and
> > > 2.2.1 (Initial Power-Up (G3 to S0)). The deassertion of PERST# should
> > > be delayed 100ms (TPVPERL) for the power and clock to become stable.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: qizhong cheng <qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com>
> > > Acked-by: Pali Rohár <pali@kernel.org>

> > ...
> > 3) Most importantly, this needs to be reconciled with the similar
> > change to the apple driver:
> > 
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211123180636.80558-2-maz@kernel.org
> > 
> > In the apple driver, we're doing:
> > 
> >   - Assert PERST#
> >   - Set up REFCLK
> >   - Sleep 100us (T_perst-clk, CEM r5 2.2, 2.9.2)
> >   - Deassert PERST#
> >   - Sleep 100ms (not sure there's a name? PCIe r5 6.6.1)
> > 
> > But here in mediatek, we're doing:
> > 
> >   - Assert PERST#
> >   - Sleep 100ms (T_pvperl, CEM r5 2.2, 2.2.1, 2.9.2)
> >   - Deassert PERST#
> > 
> > My questions:
> 
> My understanding of the the Apple PCIe hardware is somewhat limited but:
> 
> >   - Where does apple enforce T_pvperl?  I can't tell where power to
> >     the slot is turned on.
> 
> So far all available machines only have PCIe devices that are soldered
> onto the motherboard, so there are no "real" slots.  As far as we can
> tell the PCIe power domain is already powered on at the point where
> the m1n1 bootloader takes control.  There is a GPIO that controls
> power to some devices (WiFi, SDHC on the M1 Pro/Max laptops) and those
> devices are initially powered off.  The Linux driver doesn't currently
> attempt to power these devices on, but U-Boot will power them on if
> the appropriate GPIO is defined in the device tree.  The way this is
> specified in the device tree is still under discussion.

Does this mean we basically assume that m1n1 and early Linux boot
takes at least the 100ms T_pvperl required by CEM sec 2.2, but we take
pains to delay the 100us T_perst-clk?  That seems a little weird, but
I guess it is clear that REFCLK is *not* enabled before we enable it,
so we do need at least the 100us there.

It also niggles at me a little that the spec says T_pvperl starts from
*power stable* (not from power enable) and T_perst-clk starts from
*REFCLK stable* (not REFCLK enable).  Since we don't know the time
from enable to stable, it seems like native drivers should add some
circuit-specific constants to the spec values.

> >   - Where does mediatek enforce the PCIe sec 6.6.1 delay after
> >     deasserting PERST# and before config requests?
> > 
> >   - Does either apple or mediatek support speeds greater than 5 GT/s,
> >     and if so, shouldn't we start the sec 6.6.1 100ms delay *after*
> >     Link training completes?
> 
> The Apple hardware advertises support for 8 GT/s, but all the devices
> integrated on the Mac mini support only 2.5 GT/s or 5 GT/s.

The spec doesn't say anything about what the downstream devices
support (obviously it can't because we don't *know* what those devices
are until after we enumerate them).  So to be pedantically correct,
I'd argue that we should pay attention to what the Root Port
advertises.  Of course, I don't think we do this correctly *anywhere*
today.

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-08  4:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-07  8:41 [RESEND PATCH v2] PCI: mediatek: Delay 100ms to wait power and clock to become stable qizhong cheng
2021-12-07 17:54 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-07 18:01   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-07 21:00   ` Mark Kettenis
2021-12-08  4:12     ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2021-12-08  6:07       ` qizhong.cheng
2021-12-08 10:18         ` Pali Rohár
2021-12-09 11:51           ` qizhong.cheng
2021-12-09 13:00             ` Pali Rohár
2021-12-09 15:59               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-20  9:27               ` qizhong.cheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211208041228.GA103736@bhelgaas \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=alyssa@rosenzweig.io \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=chuanjia.liu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jianjun.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
    --cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    --cc=qizhong.cheng@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ryder.lee@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).