linux-mediatek.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
To: Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@mediatek.com>,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:05:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3dd41039-0151-4ee0-3940-3aceeaff17d1@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211230114913.9829-2-johnson.wang@mediatek.com>

Il 30/12/21 12:49, Johnson Wang ha scritto:
> MT8186 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6366 for
> power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> access PMIC_MT6366.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johnson Wang <johnson.wang@mediatek.com>

Hello Johnson,
thanks for the patch!

However, there's something to improve...

> ---
>   drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> index 952bc554f443..4af713274468 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>   #define PWRAP_GET_WACS_REQ(x)		(((x) >> 19) & 0x00000001)
>   #define PWRAP_STATE_SYNC_IDLE0		BIT(20)
>   #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0		BIT(21)
> +#define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2	BIT(22)
>   #define PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1		BIT(15)
>   
>   /* macro for WACS FSM */
> @@ -77,6 +78,8 @@
>   #define PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN	BIT(3)
>   #define PWRAP_CAP_WDT_SRC1	BIT(4)
>   #define PWRAP_CAP_ARB		BIT(5)
> +#define PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2	BIT(6)
> +#define PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2	BIT(8)
>   
>   /* defines for slave device wrapper registers */
>   enum dew_regs {
> @@ -1063,6 +1066,55 @@ static int mt8516_regs[] = {
>   	[PWRAP_MSB_FIRST] =		0x170,
>   };
>   
> +static int mt8186_regs[] = {
> +	[PWRAP_MUX_SEL] =		0x0,
> +	[PWRAP_WRAP_EN] =		0x4,
> +	[PWRAP_DIO_EN] =		0x8,
> +	[PWRAP_RDDMY] =			0x20,
> +	[PWRAP_CSHEXT_WRITE] =		0x24,
> +	[PWRAP_CSHEXT_READ] =		0x28,
> +	[PWRAP_CSLEXT_WRITE] =		0x2C,
> +	[PWRAP_CSLEXT_READ] =		0x30,
> +	[PWRAP_EXT_CK_WRITE] =		0x34,
> +	[PWRAP_STAUPD_CTRL] =		0x3C,
> +	[PWRAP_STAUPD_GRPEN] =		0x40,
> +	[PWRAP_EINT_STA0_ADR] =		0x44,
> +	[PWRAP_EINT_STA1_ADR] =		0x48,
> +	[PWRAP_INT_CLR] =		0xC8,
> +	[PWRAP_INT_FLG] =		0xC4,
> +	[PWRAP_MAN_EN] =		0x7C,
> +	[PWRAP_MAN_CMD] =		0x80,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS0_EN] =		0x8C,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS1_EN] =		0x94,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS2_EN] =		0x9C,
> +	[PWRAP_INIT_DONE0] =		0x90,
> +	[PWRAP_INIT_DONE1] =		0x98,
> +	[PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] =		0xA0,
> +	[PWRAP_INT_EN] =		0xBC,
> +	[PWRAP_INT1_EN] =		0xCC,
> +	[PWRAP_INT1_FLG] =		0xD4,
> +	[PWRAP_INT1_CLR] =		0xD8,
> +	[PWRAP_TIMER_EN] =		0xF0,
> +	[PWRAP_WDT_UNIT] =		0xF8,
> +	[PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN] =		0xFC,
> +	[PWRAP_WDT_SRC_EN_1] =		0x100,
> +	[PWRAP_WDT_FLG] =		0x104,
> +	[PWRAP_SPMINF_STA] =		0x1B4,
> +	[PWRAP_DCM_EN] =		0x1EC,
> +	[PWRAP_DCM_DBC_PRD] =		0x1F0,
> +	[PWRAP_GPSINF_0_STA] =		0x204,
> +	[PWRAP_GPSINF_1_STA] =		0x208,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS0_CMD] =		0xC00,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS0_RDATA] =		0xC04,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS0_VLDCLR] =		0xC08,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS1_CMD] =		0xC10,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS1_RDATA] =		0xC14,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS1_VLDCLR] =		0xC18,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] =		0xC20,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] =		0xC24,
> +	[PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] =		0xC28,
> +};
> +
>   enum pmic_type {
>   	PMIC_MT6323,
>   	PMIC_MT6351,
> @@ -1083,6 +1135,7 @@ enum pwrap_type {
>   	PWRAP_MT8135,
>   	PWRAP_MT8173,
>   	PWRAP_MT8183,
> +	PWRAP_MT8186,
>   	PWRAP_MT8195,
>   	PWRAP_MT8516,
>   };
> @@ -1535,6 +1588,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp)
>   	case PWRAP_MT6779:
>   	case PWRAP_MT6797:
>   	case PWRAP_MT8173:
> +	case PWRAP_MT8186:
>   	case PWRAP_MT8516:
>   		pwrap_writel(wrp, 1, PWRAP_CIPHER_EN);
>   		break;
> @@ -2069,6 +2123,19 @@ static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8516 = {
>   	.init_soc_specific = NULL,
>   };
>   
> +static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8186 = {
> +	.regs = mt8186_regs,
> +	.type = PWRAP_MT8186,
> +	.arb_en_all = 0xfb27f,
> +	.int_en_all = 0xfffffffe, /* disable WatchDog Timeout for bit 1 */
> +	.int1_en_all =  0x000017ff, /* disable Matching interrupt for bit 13 */
> +	.spi_w = PWRAP_MAN_CMD_SPI_WRITE,
> +	.wdt_src = PWRAP_WDT_SRC_MASK_ALL,
> +	.caps = PWRAP_CAP_INT1_EN | PWRAP_CAP_MONITOR_V2 | PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2,
> +	.init_reg_clock = pwrap_common_init_reg_clock,
> +	.init_soc_specific = NULL,
> +};
> +
>   static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
>   	{
>   		.compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-pwrap",
> @@ -2097,6 +2164,9 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_pwrap_match_tbl[] = {
>   	}, {
>   		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-pwrap",
>   		.data = &pwrap_mt8183,
> +	}, {
> +		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-pwrap",
> +		.data = &pwrap_mt8186,
>   	}, {
>   		.compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pwrap",
>   		.data = &pwrap_mt8195,
> @@ -2112,7 +2182,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_pwrap_match_tbl);
>   static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
>   	int ret, irq;
> -	u32 mask_done;
> +	u32 rdata;
>   	struct pmic_wrapper *wrp;
>   	struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>   	const struct of_device_id *of_slave_id = NULL;
> @@ -2207,12 +2277,16 @@ static int pwrap_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB))
> -		mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1;
> +	if (!HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB))
> +		rdata = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA) &
> +				    PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0;
> +	else if (!HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2))
> +		rdata = pwrap_readl(wrp, PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA) &
> +				    PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2;

Why are you changing the logic here?
I think that assigning to `mask_done` is a good option, reducing duplication and
also reducing the amount of changes for this patch.

That said, I would simply do it as follows:

	if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB))

		mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE1;

	else if (HAS_CAP(wrp->master->caps, PWRAP_CAP_ARB_V2))

		mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0_V2;

	else

		mask_done = PWRAP_STATE_INIT_DONE0;

Regards,
- Angelo

_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-30 11:49 [PATCH 0/2] Add PMIC wrapper support for Mediatek MT8186 SoC IC Johnson Wang
2021-12-30 11:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8186 SoC Johnson Wang
2022-01-04  9:05   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno [this message]
2022-01-07  2:05     ` Johnson Wang
2021-12-30 11:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: mediatek: add compatible for MT8186 pwrap Johnson Wang
2022-01-04  9:05   ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3dd41039-0151-4ee0-3940-3aceeaff17d1@collabora.com \
    --to=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johnson.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).