From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B6AC432C0 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 20:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BB6C2070B for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 20:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="RDGksdgu"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="jn5nPOdz" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 9BB6C2070B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=WV3MMFlm2ucnOfEUaQfZbPhDfcdSumcE7TQlLHDIST4=; b=RDGksdgu3F2hXA gxWcMTfy26vEzc10znEtHFgwN6KV16bYNvNG5Z9rA0dJ859gfiSEONO5UAc+XMpB8dl3jbkY4VstO NgktnippCHfhSxPUzby7fWc97M31KcXb8EeV72nzhfcO6nC3cwRIJKBwUUJc9FSmn/TT+sN6XsY1h F4yhAYCQ+GyXZX5BeM9sDMCX5b0RmVuMdFMwqbal/kIoVwd25DMhdgFX/mQp5mtZMf9m1OagS96nS o5OSzyDXyPvjJqqU+2sMw1pxb7PcCGoIN9ObRc6COJ5vDg/Iwx8ULytK5Rk161fWDCJ010dsiZsxO qncD5u1Q0tK7Xvm6660w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ibsfx-0006Hc-8z; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:52:09 +0000 Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ibsft-0006F5-DV; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:52:07 +0000 Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id i11so927791iol.13; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 12:52:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=yKoJSkDsfIMrRW3jw85HKe2BQZ9NViBue+DgpdqXPJk=; b=jn5nPOdzEW+w5jzVGwuZ5oFeYEJf8WBlojzcbzo0FpQpz8lU3xlwetOymXe33RV0vU rZIUB8uzWSed5dAOZ1mQV8JCVBog+b8KG4/DzRaXJXK6jqkoWbOhqSlwP5HgyP7tpA1F sZOxbnADrE1RzNLnPdosncLvIUYhSNdiY5DzW7oxY59mP20Eg/u0Prwm4gBh32Q/n4J9 GV8x5s3ajEkkySKLDzpqU3t0idoZb/hk/zqyucuqOWZLmopIcohvyGZ0mCdu/5Fjm4V6 91n5ODv3rGa/fc60puo1AB0cc1S+Tf15xJgp0UInowtD9CGErLbGPkAFEeLQiB55Jmxs HKBQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yKoJSkDsfIMrRW3jw85HKe2BQZ9NViBue+DgpdqXPJk=; b=UfjDp/BTmkm29hldXeYlwfy49yOR7ntcqd0xU1SaFj7X0tMGsFKWvqWNvwLKMpWYGJ O3xFNSaUUYmvh11NqsgspL1hpHyeT6eh4X7s7l/aX8lwnTQ5oVxyZtjUfc28ndFqHHgM fxszwGCcXyY6zBkMCZwgJSjVy4+mierCTKmvGpXE13tsYpjqx+x1VhQCZcefQSEsQ0Xu 2wei1ryJBPBlGtuKQEfJvXRs5NwDfLG7n13IcYSQzXC1Ltu9IJC/FICBk+ZlWkeBnL0B UOnd8GbsoPdZd0Bb0uigHJA9+t+dRcH93V/4aiWqa6yyhhqrqRxG60EX8nmdLcMWLof1 3QUw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVnAHOqJcpRl6Ds2iH4wA+aasGDYQNJii4csL15WHCqtMqmCdH/ p/hIjrRd2XrmK0FGuUS+C8+ipcNf/ZDs5llqxRg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzWJF+0Ki7M75FXoNw5UEUbhPWmgMVsemvAdnlzFn4gnf/vkOuGYX8u/xhrshBT2ODP7R8nZZfzmzkVwC/iQMQ= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:5914:: with SMTP id n20mr744400iob.42.1575319924442; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 12:52:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191202193230.21310-1-sam@ravnborg.org> <20191202204802.GA23600@ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20191202204802.GA23600@ravnborg.org> From: Jeffrey Hugo Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2019 13:51:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/26] drm/panel infrastructure + backlight update To: Sam Ravnborg X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20191202_125205_482176_413851FE X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Neil Armstrong , David Airlie , Linus Walleij , Stefan Agner , Andrzej Hajda , Thierry Reding , Laurent Pinchart , Benjamin Gaignard , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Abhinav Kumar , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Tomi Valkeinen , NXP Linux Team , Jagan Teki , Jitao Shi , Daniel Vetter , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, "open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" , linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Sean Paul , Linux ARM , Purism Kernel Team , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Boris Brezillon , Pengutronix Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:48 PM Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > Hi Jeffrey. > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_manager.c | 2 +- > > > > How come the diff stat in the cover letter here indicates a change to > > this file, yet I cannot find a change to this file in any of the > > patches? What am I missing? > > This file is patched in "[PATCH v1 06/26] drm/panel: decouple connector > from drm_panel" > > See: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-December/247186.html > > The above patch touches a lot of files/drivers so it was cc: to > a lot of people. Maybe is was considered as spam? Interesting. I missed that I didn't have patch 6 in the series in my inbox. Its also not in my spam box. I wonder where it went. Thanks for the direct link to the patch. I saw no concerns. _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek