From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A23C433DF for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 05:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94E722068F for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 05:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="lT2hepUu"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="whTqEGVe" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 94E722068F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From: Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=rpdm87IR9zfbyXPS0IyHu0Tm/++EU4TCGUAy9FswHH8=; b=lT2hepUugBEDwRrxJjfKlTsDT S/B9scTIELI/5iB6o2bxSFhaPBqvMiq8N1Nd0u+nKDGbTTIINw/SaHdVbcc2e7lFV8KVc+GxQmOub /eWlQ+Ix30pXUk/+zwdmiRDDxZksMZRSRqRBG7BWRZfbwTnJ9Fy+e+aykA3qpqEpVM7zXUlB1FVxk cUbhpg1rv+VpBPSvvdmIaAf3+ieFgJ5Jks2jqjIcxAIeQslGbIgXySXeCZnXamK7/P5sCGM5PbwVZ 3EWRgeqPgrEs8VsKYMlRmkEJj+g63fGkBXcxQEm6F39PbpirDBqQKyB8yiBolCyAWJfrIoXGSkxi2 i3UYQRIiQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k2SdA-0001eF-0G; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 05:03:24 +0000 Received: from mail29.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.29]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k2Sd6-0001dU-Cm for linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 05:03:21 +0000 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1596430998; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=ZEq3dQL1T4rfyaJOBFm/8UoCpiFNlnou1J2+YfKngHo=; b=whTqEGVeCy/7K/yN3Dhc9OPTE87fGLv0ie08jHB8iaWtD6oH/6F+Cwl8i3e9IsCwy3l4q8vt nhTkWmGljjA2Smu6tgHP3f+oZGvtgF4OTxQ8hXCxjf+pYOgFugBwq+TdsDX5omuuARl1QjUi TRx1fprU1HO9uzG0uJ6MKkBlyX8= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.29 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyI0ZDIyMyIsICJsaW51eC1tZWRpYXRla0BsaXN0cy5pbmZyYWRlYWQub3JnIiwgImJlOWU0YSJd Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n02.prod.us-west-2.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f279a96ba6d142d1c679964 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 05:03:18 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 45062C433CA; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 05:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cang) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 198A3C433C6; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 05:03:16 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2020 13:03:16 +0800 From: Can Guo To: Stanley Chu Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] scsi: ufs: Quiesce all scsi devices before shutdown In-Reply-To: <20200803042514.7111-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> References: <20200803042514.7111-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: cang@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200803_010320_517957_260E3EA7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 24.88 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: jiajie.hao@mediatek.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, andy.teng@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, avri.altman@wdc.com, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, beanhuo@micron.com, chaotian.jing@mediatek.com, cc.chou@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, bvanassche@acm.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Stanley, On 2020-08-03 12:25, Stanley Chu wrote: > Currently I/O request could be still submitted to UFS device while > UFS is working on shutdown flow. This may lead to racing as below > scenarios and finally system may crash due to unclocked register > accesses. > > To fix this kind of issues, in ufshcd_shutdown(), > > 1. Use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead of resuming UFS device by > ufshcd_runtime_resume() "internally" to let runtime PM framework > manage and prevent concurrent runtime operations by incoming I/O > requests. > > 2. Specifically quiesce all SCSI devices to block all I/O requests > after device is resumed. > > Example of racing scenario: While UFS device is runtime-suspended > > Thread #1: Executing UFS shutdown flow, e.g., > ufshcd_suspend(UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM) > > Thread #2: Executing runtime resume flow triggered by I/O request, > e.g., ufshcd_resume(UFS_RUNTIME_PM) > > This breaks the assumption that UFS PM flows can not be running > concurrently and some unexpected racing behavior may happen. > > Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu > --- > Changes: > - Since v4: Use pm_runtime_get_sync() instead of resuming UFS device > by ufshcd_runtime_resume() "internally". > --- > drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > index 307622284239..fc01171d13b1 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c > @@ -159,6 +159,12 @@ struct ufs_pm_lvl_states ufs_pm_lvl_states[] = { > {UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE, UIC_LINK_OFF_STATE}, > }; > > +#define ufshcd_scsi_for_each_sdev(fn) \ > + list_for_each_entry(starget, &hba->host->__targets, siblings) { \ > + __starget_for_each_device(starget, NULL, \ > + fn); \ > + } > + > static inline enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode > ufs_get_pm_lvl_to_dev_pwr_mode(enum ufs_pm_level lvl) > { > @@ -8629,6 +8635,13 @@ int ufshcd_runtime_idle(struct ufs_hba *hba) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(ufshcd_runtime_idle); > > +static void ufshcd_quiesce_sdev(struct scsi_device *sdev, void *data) > +{ > + /* Suspended devices are already quiesced so can be skipped */ Why can runtime suspended sdevs be skipped? Block layer can still resume them at any time, no? > + if (!pm_runtime_suspended(&sdev->sdev_gendev)) > + scsi_device_quiesce(sdev); > +} > + > /** > * ufshcd_shutdown - shutdown routine > * @hba: per adapter instance > @@ -8640,6 +8653,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ufshcd_runtime_idle); > int ufshcd_shutdown(struct ufs_hba *hba) > { > int ret = 0; > + struct scsi_target *starget; > > if (!hba->is_powered) > goto out; > @@ -8647,11 +8661,26 @@ int ufshcd_shutdown(struct ufs_hba *hba) > if (ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_poweroff(hba) && ufshcd_is_link_off(hba)) > goto out; > > - if (pm_runtime_suspended(hba->dev)) { > - ret = ufshcd_runtime_resume(hba); > - if (ret) > - goto out; > - } > + /* > + * Let runtime PM framework manage and prevent concurrent runtime > + * operations with shutdown flow. > + */ > + pm_runtime_get_sync(hba->dev); > + > + /* > + * Quiesce all SCSI devices to prevent any non-PM requests sending > + * from block layer during and after shutdown. > + * > + * Here we can not use blk_cleanup_queue() since PM requests > + * (with BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT flag) are still required to be sent > + * through block layer. Therefore SCSI command queued after the > + * scsi_target_quiesce() call returned will block until > + * blk_cleanup_queue() is called. > + * > + * Besides, scsi_target_"un"quiesce (e.g., scsi_target_resume) can > + * be ignored since shutdown is one-way flow. > + */ > + ufshcd_scsi_for_each_sdev(ufshcd_quiesce_sdev); Any reasons why don't use scsi_target_quiesce() here? Thanks, Can Guo. > > ret = ufshcd_suspend(hba, UFS_SHUTDOWN_PM); > out: _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek