From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Jiaxin Yu <jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
yong.liang@mediatek.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
perex@perex.cz, tzungbi@google.com, broonie@kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, eason.yen@mediatek.com,
yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, wim@linux-watchdog.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] watchdog: mtk_wdt: mt8183: Add reset controller
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 10:51:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e138b69efad563822da1db8e160d43458c21eae1.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125061627.GA7313@roeck-us.net>
Hi,
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 22:16 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:03:50AM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote:
> > From: "yong.liang" <yong.liang@mediatek.com>
> >
> > Add reset controller API in watchdog driver.
> > Besides watchdog, MTK toprgu module also provide sub-system (eg, audio,
> > camera, codec and connectivity) software reset functionality.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: yong.liang <yong.liang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: jiaxin.yu <jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 1 +
> > drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > index 2e07caab9db2..629249fe5305 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
> > @@ -717,6 +717,7 @@ config MEDIATEK_WATCHDOG
> > tristate "Mediatek SoCs watchdog support"
> > depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> > select WATCHDOG_CORE
> > + select RESET_CONTROLLER
> > help
> > Say Y here to include support for the watchdog timer
> > in Mediatek SoCs.
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c
> > index 9c3d0033260d..d29484c7940a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/mtk_wdt.c
> > @@ -9,6 +9,9 @@
> > * Based on sunxi_wdt.c
> > */
> >
> > +#include <dt-bindings/reset-controller/mt2712-resets.h>
> > +#include <dt-bindings/reset-controller/mt8183-resets.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > #include <linux/err.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > @@ -16,10 +19,12 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/types.h>
> > #include <linux/watchdog.h>
> > -#include <linux/delay.h>
> >
> > #define WDT_MAX_TIMEOUT 31
> > #define WDT_MIN_TIMEOUT 1
> > @@ -44,6 +49,9 @@
> > #define WDT_SWRST 0x14
> > #define WDT_SWRST_KEY 0x1209
> >
> > +#define WDT_SWSYSRST 0x18U
> > +#define WDT_SWSYS_RST_KEY 0x88000000
> > +
> > #define DRV_NAME "mtk-wdt"
> > #define DRV_VERSION "1.0"
> >
> > @@ -53,8 +61,99 @@ static unsigned int timeout;
> > struct mtk_wdt_dev {
> > struct watchdog_device wdt_dev;
> > void __iomem *wdt_base;
> > + spinlock_t lock; /* protects WDT_SWSYSRST reg */
> > + struct reset_controller_dev rcdev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct mtk_wdt_data {
> > + int sw_rst_num;
> > };
> >
> > +static const struct mtk_wdt_data mt2712_data = {
> > + .sw_rst_num = MT2712_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_wdt_data mt8183_data = {
> > + .sw_rst_num = MT8183_TOPRGU_SW_RST_NUM,
> > +};
>
> The number of resets can be set in .data directly; there is no need
> for the structures.
>
> > +
> > +static int toprgu_reset_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > + unsigned long id)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int tmp;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct mtk_wdt_dev *data =
> > + container_of(rcdev, struct mtk_wdt_dev, rcdev);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + tmp = __raw_readl(data->wdt_base + WDT_SWSYSRST);
I think this should be readl_relaxed() instead. I don't expect this
driver will ever be used on a big-endian architecture, but mixing
__raw_readl() and writel() does look dangerous.
> > + tmp |= BIT(id);
> > + tmp |= WDT_SWSYS_RST_KEY;
> > + writel(tmp, data->wdt_base + WDT_SWSYSRST);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int toprgu_reset_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > + unsigned long id)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int tmp;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct mtk_wdt_dev *data =
> > + container_of(rcdev, struct mtk_wdt_dev, rcdev);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&data->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + tmp = __raw_readl(data->wdt_base + WDT_SWSYSRST);
> > + tmp &= ~BIT(id);
> > + tmp |= WDT_SWSYS_RST_KEY;
> > + writel(tmp, data->wdt_base + WDT_SWSYSRST);
> > +
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&data->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> There is a lot of duplication in those functions. Only one line
> is different. I think this is a good example where a helper function
> with an additional argument indicating set or reset would be helpful.
>
> > +
> > +static int toprgu_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> > + unsigned long id)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = toprgu_reset_assert(rcdev, id);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return toprgu_reset_deassert(rcdev, id);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct reset_control_ops toprgu_reset_ops = {
> > + .assert = toprgu_reset_assert,
> > + .deassert = toprgu_reset_deassert,
> > + .reset = toprgu_reset,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int toprgu_register_reset_controller(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + int rst_num)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + struct mtk_wdt_dev *mtk_wdt = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> > +
> > + spin_lock_init(&mtk_wdt->lock);
> > +
> > + mtk_wdt->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > + mtk_wdt->rcdev.nr_resets = rst_num;
> > + mtk_wdt->rcdev.ops = &toprgu_reset_ops;
> > + mtk_wdt->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > + ret = reset_controller_register(&mtk_wdt->rcdev);
I see this driver uses devm_kzalloc() below. Should this be
devm_reset_controller_register()?
> > + if (ret != 0)
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> > + "couldn't register wdt reset controller: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static int mtk_wdt_restart(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev,
> > unsigned long action, void *data)
> > {
> > @@ -155,6 +254,7 @@ static int mtk_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct mtk_wdt_dev *mtk_wdt;
> > + struct mtk_wdt_data *wdt_data;
> > int err;
> >
> > mtk_wdt = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*mtk_wdt), GFP_KERNEL);
regards
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 6:16 [PATCH v5 2/2] watchdog: mtk_wdt: mt8183: Add reset controller Guenter Roeck
2019-11-25 9:51 ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2019-11-29 8:36 ` Yong Liang
2019-12-02 13:02 ` Philipp Zabel
2019-12-03 3:02 ` Yong Liang
2019-12-03 5:05 ` Guenter Roeck
2019-11-29 10:39 ` Yong Liang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-11-25 3:03 [PATCH v5 0/2] ASoC: mt8183: fix audio playback slowly after playback Jiaxin Yu
2019-11-25 3:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] watchdog: mtk_wdt: mt8183: Add reset controller Jiaxin Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e138b69efad563822da1db8e160d43458c21eae1.camel@pengutronix.de \
--to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=eason.yen@mediatek.com \
--cc=jiaxin.yu@mediatek.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tzungbi@google.com \
--cc=wim@linux-watchdog.org \
--cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=yong.liang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).