From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD25DC433EF for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:02:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=9SRphFsLWnjuGGOksd4DusUfrpKMU/J1NQO37otumh8=; b=gjyDdsWveaiNgS tFJJxOgDTL3e6proDJZvsTum4nuoyOO0C3EbayTxeTuZ3yQGq9UooGTDrsPiVs3qsrJeCqm0FeUos Kffus3uJlfZz5v84Lx6c6WZRxueyz3lraNjKL98NOvWmmLqzfO9UH5/OhhQAN+L+lIrxUIRTPIW+V XZlphDKIp3GP3NkZH8bPsPL7bay4tWrifTCx9zM4F2JVK6zjqXJ555OXCZTRfVPU5mTtAB51SNrU2 xOMkxQArdiwfJrX6EzBVGW4acJHQfeQEBgps5FAkvHpoJpcO2szeAJwGjQVA7cGImLsfWG45eWlhF zgZMO4BWkz75Lo21YX/A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n7zkC-00601f-2U; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:02:20 +0000 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1n7zis-005zY5-7t; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:00:59 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1642078858; x=1673614858; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=32/jYdeCU2X6mvfWD1NZQLh3feFmBCWh91f1bLsYOlw=; b=iAplYQSt+vUYR+EiuE/zCeUaylhb1VpQw9O2lRNsN+HqHfNM5irrzFk2 R5jUsk1v5QphLMDCSVR1Nj9gW5XnX5t2ZWDdjqW6o38JMApZF9YgxwOru uGWhD6dffG6kZmuNVIOvcRhClxIDBZMUXKXTgFXvUSeqk2PYuc1ODzvqn m+Q5Gn1PjxuLzRP6N6GE3xcdnYMT90jvNK3g9CYklEkx/DevyTW5ctK+w H8xo5Czf26XQHMTnzSvx4ij8DR76CQb8pQOGQiWrWPz59WsRpwy91qPMz bU2t+mlxVwYgTCgbQS0TGA0rlMS/F+7Ctzz6ZyrJF3zyhhiVB7CDdwd0j Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10225"; a="241561690" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,286,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="241561690" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Jan 2022 05:00:52 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,286,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="473208325" Received: from orsmsx605.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.229.18]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Jan 2022 05:00:47 -0800 Received: from orsmsx610.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.23) by ORSMSX605.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:00:47 -0800 Received: from orsmsx611.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.24) by ORSMSX610.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.229.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:00:46 -0800 Received: from orsmsx611.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.229.24]) by ORSMSX611.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.229.24]) with mapi id 15.01.2308.020; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 05:00:46 -0800 From: "Ruhl, Michael J" To: "Ruhl, Michael J" , "guangming.cao@mediatek.com" , "sumit.semwal@linaro.org" CC: "jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com" , "lmark@codeaurora.org" , "wsd_upstream@mediatek.com" , "christian.koenig@amd.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , "yf.wang@mediatek.com" , "linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "libo.kang@mediatek.com" , "benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org" , "bo.song@mediatek.com" , "matthias.bgg@gmail.com" , "labbott@redhat.com" , "mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation Thread-Topic: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation Thread-Index: AQHYCHnKJjUnVmCmlECrXD1d8qRuLKxg6T0QgAAAbjA= Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:00:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20220113123406.11520-1-guangming.cao@mediatek.com> <4f88205c1b344aea8608960e2f85b8f4@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4f88205c1b344aea8608960e2f85b8f4@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.6.200.16 x-originating-ip: [10.1.200.100] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220113_050058_355349_EC9AADA1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.47 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "Linux-mediatek" Errors-To: linux-mediatek-bounces+linux-mediatek=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org >-----Original Message----- >From: dri-devel On Behalf Of >Ruhl, Michael J >Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 7:58 AM >To: guangming.cao@mediatek.com; sumit.semwal@linaro.org >Cc: jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com; lmark@codeaurora.org; >wsd_upstream@mediatek.com; christian.koenig@amd.com; linux- >kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; >yf.wang@mediatek.com; linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org; linux- >mediatek@lists.infradead.org; libo.kang@mediatek.com; >benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org; bo.song@mediatek.com; >matthias.bgg@gmail.com; labbott@redhat.com; >mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- >media@vger.kernel.org >Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: dri-devel On Behalf Of >>guangming.cao@mediatek.com >>Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 7:34 AM >>To: sumit.semwal@linaro.org >>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; mingyuan.ma@mediatek.com; >>Guangming ; >>wsd_upstream@mediatek.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; dri- >>devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org; >>yf.wang@mediatek.com; libo.kang@mediatek.com; >>benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org; bo.song@mediatek.com; >>matthias.bgg@gmail.com; linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org; >>lmark@codeaurora.org; labbott@redhat.com; christian.koenig@amd.com; >>jianjiao.zeng@mediatek.com; linux-media@vger.kernel.org >>Subject: [PATCH v3] dma-buf: dma-heap: Add a size check for allocation >> >>From: Guangming >> >>Add a size check for allocation since the allocation size is >>always less than the total DRAM size. >> >>Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process that >>can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it will >>cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find who are >>using >>so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant dma-buf >>hasn't exported. >> >>To make OOM issue easier, maybe need dma-buf framework to dump the >>buffer size >>under allocating in "dma_buf_debug_show". >> >>Signed-off-by: Guangming >>Signed-off-by: jianjiao zeng >>--- >>v3: 1. update patch, use right shift to replace division. >> 2. update patch, add reason in code and commit message. >>v2: 1. update size limitation as total_dram page size. >> 2. update commit message >>--- >> drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c | 10 ++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) >> >>diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c >>index 56bf5ad01ad5..1fd382712584 100644 >>--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c >>+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-heap.c >>@@ -55,6 +55,16 @@ static int dma_heap_buffer_alloc(struct dma_heap >>*heap, size_t len, >> struct dma_buf *dmabuf; >> int fd; >> >>+ /* >>+ * Invalid size check. The "len" should be less than totalram. >>+ * >>+ * Without this check, once the invalid size allocation runs on a process >>that >>+ * can't be killed by OOM flow(such as "gralloc" on Android devices), it >>will >>+ * cause a kernel exception, and to make matters worse, we can't find >>who are using >>+ * so many memory with "dma_buf_debug_show" since the relevant >>dma-buf hasn't exported. >>+ */ >>+ if (len >> PAGE_SHIFT > totalram_pages()) > >If your "heap" is from cma, is this still a valid check? And thinking a bit further, if I create a heap from something else (say device memory), you will need to be able to figure out the maximum allowable check for the specific heap. Maybe the heap needs a callback for max size? m >M > >>+ return -EINVAL; >> /* >> * Allocations from all heaps have to begin >> * and end on page boundaries. >>-- >>2.17.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-mediatek mailing list Linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek