From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F38C3A59F for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CBD723789 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728244AbfHaGBK (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 02:01:10 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:49226 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725903AbfHaGBA (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 02:01:00 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id B8999A0606B4FD5A4803; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:00:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.212.75) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 14:00:35 +0800 From: Yunsheng Lin To: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 5/9] s390: numa: check the node id consistently for s390 Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:19 +0800 Message-ID: <1567231103-13237-6-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> References: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.67.212.75] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting of proximity domain is optional, as below: This optional object is used to describe proximity domain associations within a machine. _PXM evaluates to an integer that identifies a device as belonging to a Proximity Domain defined in the System Resource Affinity Table (SRAT). This patch checks node id with the below case before returning node_to_cpumask_map[node]: 1. if node_id >= nr_node_ids, return cpu_none_mask 2. if node_id < 0, return cpu_online_mask 3. if node_to_cpumask_map[node_id] is NULL, return cpu_online_mask [1] https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin --- Note node_to_cpumask_map[node] is already a pointer, so returning &node_to_cpumask_map[node] does not seem to be correct, if this is problem, maybe clean it up in another patch. --- arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h index cca406f..75340ca 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/topology.h @@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu) #define cpumask_of_node cpumask_of_node static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) { + if (node >= nr_node_ids) + return cpu_none_mask; + + if (node < 0 || !node_to_cpumask_map[node]) + return cpu_online_mask; + return &node_to_cpumask_map[node]; } -- 2.8.1