From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: unify the dma_capable definitions
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 10:27:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c227c91-512c-e871-0e03-a27b2c0435d7@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113073539.9660-2-hch@lst.de>
Hi Christoph,
On 13.11.2019 08:35, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently each architectures that wants to override dma_to_phys and
> phys_to_dma also has to provide dma_capable. But there isn't really
> any good reason for that. powerpc and mips just have copies of the
> generic one minus the latests fix, and the arm one was the inspiration
> for said fix, but misses the bus_dma_mask handling.
> Make all architectures use the generic version instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This patch breaks DMAengine PL330 driver on Samsung Exynos SoCs:
[ 3.602338] dma-pl330 12690000.pdma: overflow 0x13810020+1 of DMA
mask ffffffff bus mask 0
[ 3.605113] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3.609719] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at kernel/dma/direct.c:36
report_addr+0xc0/0xfc
[ 3.617226] Modules linked in:
[ 3.620271] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
5.4.0-rc5-00056-gb037b220e71d #6911
[ 3.627986] Hardware name: SAMSUNG EXYNOS (Flattened Device Tree)
[ 3.634094] [<c01124e8>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010dfcc>]
(show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 3.641803] [<c010dfcc>] (show_stack) from [<c0ae9af8>]
(dump_stack+0xa8/0xd4)
[ 3.649002] [<c0ae9af8>] (dump_stack) from [<c012746c>]
(__warn+0xf4/0x10c)
[ 3.655940] [<c012746c>] (__warn) from [<c0127534>]
(warn_slowpath_fmt+0xb0/0xb8)
[ 3.663404] [<c0127534>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<c01b4ff4>]
(report_addr+0xc0/0xfc)
[ 3.671303] [<c01b4ff4>] (report_addr) from [<c01b5264>]
(dma_direct_map_resource+0x98/0xa0)
[ 3.679739] [<c01b5264>] (dma_direct_map_resource) from [<c04fbb58>]
(pl330_prep_slave_fifo+0xe4/0x128)
[ 3.689099] [<c04fbb58>] (pl330_prep_slave_fifo) from [<c04fe2b8>]
(pl330_prep_slave_sg+0x54/0x1cc)
[ 3.698129] [<c04fe2b8>] (pl330_prep_slave_sg) from [<c053e5f0>]
(s3c24xx_serial_start_tx_dma+0x118/0x1e8)
[ 3.707764] [<c053e5f0>] (s3c24xx_serial_start_tx_dma) from
[<c0535f70>] (uart_write+0xe4/0x1e0)
[ 3.716532] [<c0535f70>] (uart_write) from [<c05186a0>]
(n_tty_write+0x1c8/0x474)
[ 3.723992] [<c05186a0>] (n_tty_write) from [<c05163c0>]
(tty_write+0x154/0x314)
[ 3.731380] [<c05163c0>] (tty_write) from [<c02a5748>]
(__vfs_write+0x30/0x1d0)
[ 3.738662] [<c02a5748>] (__vfs_write) from [<c02a851c>]
(vfs_write+0xa4/0x180)
[ 3.745949] [<c02a851c>] (vfs_write) from [<c02a8778>]
(ksys_write+0x60/0xd8)
[ 3.753069] [<c02a8778>] (ksys_write) from [<c0101000>]
(ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x28)
[ 3.760705] Exception stack(0xee8dffa8 to 0xee8dfff0)
[ 3.765739] ffa0: 0000004a beca876c 00000002
beca876c 0000004a 00000000
[ 3.773900] ffc0: 0000004a beca876c b6f02cf0 00000004 beca876c
0000004a 00000000 b6f99010
[ 3.782056] ffe0: 0000006c beca8628 b6e1d000 b6e7a634
[ 3.787092] irq event stamp: 289740
[ 3.790571] hardirqs last enabled at (289739): [<c0b0d0c4>]
_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x6c/0x74
[ 3.799503] hardirqs last disabled at (289740): [<c0b0caf8>]
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x1c/0x58
[ 3.808011] softirqs last enabled at (289576): [<c01026bc>]
__do_softirq+0x4fc/0x5fc
[ 3.815830] softirqs last disabled at (289567): [<c0130044>]
irq_exit+0x16c/0x170
[ 3.823286] ---[ end trace b1432c658797b861 ]---
[ 3.827898] samsung-uart 13810000.serial: Unable to get desc for Tx
[ 3.834624] samsung-uart 13810000.serial: Unable to get desc for Tx
[ 3.840487] samsung-uart 13810000.serial: Unable to get desc for Tx
I'm checking now which part of it causes the issue.
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h | 19 -------------------
> arch/mips/include/asm/dma-direct.h | 8 --------
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-direct.h | 9 ---------
> include/linux/dma-direct.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> index b67e5fc1fe43..7c3001a6a775 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> @@ -14,23 +14,4 @@ static inline phys_addr_t __dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr)
> return __pfn_to_phys(dma_to_pfn(dev, dev_addr)) + offset;
> }
>
> -static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> -{
> - u64 limit, mask;
> -
> - if (!dev->dma_mask)
> - return 0;
> -
> - mask = *dev->dma_mask;
> -
> - limit = (mask + 1) & ~mask;
> - if (limit && size > limit)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if ((addr | (addr + size - 1)) & ~mask)
> - return 0;
> -
> - return 1;
> -}
> -
> #endif /* ASM_ARM_DMA_DIRECT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-direct.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> index b5c240806e1b..14e352651ce9 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> @@ -2,14 +2,6 @@
> #ifndef _MIPS_DMA_DIRECT_H
> #define _MIPS_DMA_DIRECT_H 1
>
> -static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> -{
> - if (!dev->dma_mask)
> - return false;
> -
> - return addr + size - 1 <= *dev->dma_mask;
> -}
> -
> dma_addr_t __phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr);
> phys_addr_t __dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t daddr);
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-direct.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> index a2912b47102c..e29e8a236b8d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/dma-direct.h
> @@ -2,15 +2,6 @@
> #ifndef ASM_POWERPC_DMA_DIRECT_H
> #define ASM_POWERPC_DMA_DIRECT_H 1
>
> -static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> -{
> - if (!dev->dma_mask)
> - return false;
> -
> - return addr + size - 1 <=
> - min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask);
> -}
> -
> static inline dma_addr_t __phys_to_dma(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
> {
> if (!dev)
> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-direct.h b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
> index 6db863c3eb93..991f8aa2676e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dma-direct.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dma-direct.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static inline phys_addr_t __dma_to_phys(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t dev_addr)
>
> return paddr + ((phys_addr_t)dev->dma_pfn_offset << PAGE_SHIFT);
> }
> +#endif /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA */
>
> static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
> {
> @@ -38,7 +39,6 @@ static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size)
>
> return end <= min_not_zero(*dev->dma_mask, dev->bus_dma_mask);
> }
> -#endif /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_FORCE_DMA_UNENCRYPTED
> bool force_dma_unencrypted(struct device *dev);
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-19 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-13 7:35 unify the dma_capable definition Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 7:35 ` [PATCH 1/3] dma-direct: unify the dma_capable definitions Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-14 8:47 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-19 9:27 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2019-11-19 9:44 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2019-11-19 10:26 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-11-19 16:16 ` Robin Murphy
2019-11-19 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-20 6:31 ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-11-19 10:19 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2019-11-13 7:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] dma-direct: avoid a forward declaration for phys_to_dma Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-13 7:35 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: remove support for NULL dev in __phys_to_dma / __dma_to_phys Christoph Hellwig
2019-11-14 8:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-11-13 10:18 ` unify the dma_capable definition Nicolas Saenz Julienne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1c227c91-512c-e871-0e03-a27b2c0435d7@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).