From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sat, 25 Jun 2016 00:36:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:59200 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27012495AbcFXWgChus0Y (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2016 00:36:02 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.14.8) with ESMTP id u5OMZq9o018089; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 00:35:52 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u5OMZnqB018088; Sat, 25 Jun 2016 00:35:49 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 00:35:49 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Andy Isaacson Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Thomas Bogendoerfer , Jayachandran C , Ganesan Ramalingam , David Daney , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Lorenzo Pieralisi , Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: PCI_PROBE_ONLY clean-up Message-ID: <20160624223548.GB10098@linux-mips.org> References: <20160623221441.3154.31310.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20160624155021.GD5930@linux-mips.org> <20160624184602.GG32461@hexapodia.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160624184602.GG32461@hexapodia.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 54163 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:46:02AM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote: > I don't remember the details, unfortunately, but my general recollection > is similar -- CFE on bcm1480 was doing a fairly good job of configuring > PCI, and I think we needed to preserve the configuration for Reasons > rather than letting the kernel change things away from the CFE setup. > > I unfortunately no longer have any 1480 hardware to test on, nor do I > know who's left at BCM who might be able to validate this change. I still have a small pile of Sibyte hardware of various description, including BCM91480 and can test. Ralf