From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:33:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from www.zeus03.de ([194.117.254.33]:49052 "EHLO mail.zeus03.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23992992AbcLMUcwxLUpv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:32:52 +0100 Received: (qmail 27395 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2016 21:32:52 +0100 Received: from p54b33b2f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO localhost) (l3s3148p1@84.179.59.47) by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 13 Dec 2016 21:32:52 +0100 Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 21:32:51 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jan Glauber Cc: Wolfram Sang , Paul Burton , "Steven J . Hill" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] i2c: octeon: thunderx: Limit register access retries Message-ID: <20161213203251.GA2889@katana> References: <20161209093158.3161-1-jglauber@cavium.com> <20161209093158.3161-4-jglauber@cavium.com> <20161211220148.GG2552@katana> <20161212160711.GA2766@hardcore> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161212160711.GA2766@hardcore> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 56040 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: wsa@the-dreams.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > >=20 > > I can't apply this one? > >=20 >=20 > Strange. Applies for me on top of 4.9 and also next-20161212. > I can also apply if back from the mail. Is the mail messed up on your > side? My fault, sorry for the noise. My branch missed the latest revert for 4.9. I'll apply this patch for a second pull request during the merge window. --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJYUFrzAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2TCwQAKPdTWSxHF/Xbt833qvazNvg TkDIzaX+cCEhhfzhuJg+jbE5QvUknWqJWr/Z6i9fwqHHlh5xBYx1F2x4dYFsY+N8 CU+GM449tnS3zRA48gEqpHK45DVNlqb3TdeIjar7kzIc0gO1DTALgy7yRFyaePfY xdQOTN/m+G/HvJJzXpWnnRGv7yJi4sM//CfIu17u56yJFw2hrJOxpfFDvjIvg8F/ sycFnPmP/Jq9tPXClBKiY1FlhdH6w04scocR8B9pXy66ew+WCamBe+Z97ZCHSpmm ky8PIXXyfgu40Ut9yeTDp9yn4EEsYKg8m7aMGNgWNhaw6+ByUr0ycVuwjcx+sgOM ELPXRYdLZoDrFdVge2gUkWDdUz1FtpJVByqBDTwaUdazS1y8T8b/fSo0puSOtOFF HLLErq91E5w/mW0MGd14RW2EX2jdpDqqOpPhHojQT1pX/Y80vpdM3FMvY1+g3LUv Zb4zne7fsabJpIB9nhe6Giy3NDSVTbr9J208w2rLBkNrB7CE2ZITJHl/il2o4R6V J6aR/hf312K5hQqe51nvf/HwAnKoOOBp954EMoZ7gXqTVuJ4THRXlvrGipGrBGXH x0Uws/UGOoRXoR09SZZ97AJahOAb/M3KUdPvtkEUQTyGWp7mCwBIfEI15uwg4jsv 76OmG6/MJdOtAVUMb1Ag =Knrx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--