From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:35:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:43404 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23992408AbeISKfMWxPub (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 12:35:12 +0200 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098413.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w8JAXooc055878 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:35:10 -0400 Received: from e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.103]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2mkkaxv2y9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 06:35:10 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:35:08 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp07.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.137) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 19 Sep 2018 11:35:02 +0100 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id w8JAZ1bS55509114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 19 Sep 2018 10:35:01 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE63A4051; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:34:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB092A404D; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:34:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from rapoport-lnx (unknown [9.148.207.135]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:34:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 13:34:57 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Ingo Molnar , Michael Ellerman , Michal Hocko , Paul Burton , Thomas Gleixner , Tony Luck , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/29] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK References: <1536163184-26356-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1536163184-26356-4-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180919100449.00006df9@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180919100449.00006df9@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 18091910-0028-0000-0000-000002FB7231 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 18091910-0029-0000-0000-000023B52DB5 Message-Id: <20180919103457.GA20545@rapoport-lnx> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2018-09-19_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1807170000 definitions=main-1809190110 Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 66407 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Hi Jonathan, On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:04:49AM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 18:59:18 +0300 > Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > All architecures use memblock for early memory management. There is no need > > for the CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK configuration option. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport > > Hi Mike, > > A minor editing issue in here that is stopping boot on arm64 platforms with latest > version of the mm tree. Can you please try the following patch: