From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21342C282DD for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 03:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C1621841 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 03:52:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="n6YMDDai" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730647AbfDWDvu (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 23:51:50 -0400 Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com ([210.131.2.74]:38995 "EHLO conuserg-07.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730606AbfDWDvu (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 23:51:50 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cD023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:11 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cD023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991412; bh=ck3m1Bnhk+gBZ69Ip9jiWsEf5IWvpXJTs7wxMIQoCXU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n6YMDDaiO+Y+ehsJY3BwtkUdg1YDcyPA3Dzmuu8XOwJ1WrZig5ClP17Sypb2aBakK pdb05/Mxt6GVPh61aaBT0xJP66Mu0V7s+lzlxmzMKtCZpnT8wEPrNDYE+HzwcwOsrt M+K4hgRSZ2BsDVMyqA2McjsJjJooi4+aOx81MKG7ecEsFD8/riXxDnXctaXPrCzSeY 2Awph1mCyl2BuT2YcctjtjX9fGNx3slwDHVqkisVXH/eIqwqW4g1+6Ign1Zg0xzjsQ nEbhKOdhvwUnu9BexA/KqiOdzGngWI9/3T9raieSibcixW3rUYkf2NW/Jkw05P6Tx3 svNkTBvfuxmgA== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy , Mathieu Malaterre , Masahiro Yamada Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 05/11] mtd: rawnand: vf610_nfc: add initializer to avoid -Wmaybe-uninitialized Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:53 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-6-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. Kbuild test robot has never reported -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for this probably because vf610_nfc_run() is inlined by the x86 compiler's inlining heuristic. If CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is enabled for a different architecture and vf610_nfc_run() is not inlined, the following warning is reported: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c: In function ‘vf610_nfc_cmd’: drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c:455:3: warning: ‘offset’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] vf610_nfc_rd_from_sram(instr->ctx.data.buf.in + offset, ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ nfc->regs + NFC_MAIN_AREA(0) + offset, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ trfr_sz, !nfc->data_access); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c index a662ca1970e5..19792d725ec2 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/vf610_nfc.c @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static int vf610_nfc_cmd(struct nand_chip *chip, { const struct nand_op_instr *instr; struct vf610_nfc *nfc = chip_to_nfc(chip); - int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset; + int op_id = -1, trfr_sz = 0, offset = 0; u32 col = 0, row = 0, cmd1 = 0, cmd2 = 0, code = 0; bool force8bit = false; -- 2.17.1