From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B8EC10F14 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 03:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD5120811 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 03:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="Q1F13NSr" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729599AbfDWDvr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 23:51:47 -0400 Received: from conuserg-07.nifty.com ([210.131.2.74]:38927 "EHLO conuserg-07.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730536AbfDWDvr (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 23:51:47 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (p14092-ipngnfx01kyoto.kyoto.ocn.ne.jp [153.142.97.92]) (authenticated) by conuserg-07.nifty.com with ESMTP id x3N3o2cG023044; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:50:14 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conuserg-07.nifty.com x3N3o2cG023044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1555991415; bh=7qo1vbhArO2n/LZF4sYuHYL1/6J0V//9VqfNxacUkeY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Q1F13NSrcvF2A8qD58k2kFX20pyFSYFFSEFXfst6MemH5nI+ogQbTVZV3rS+GsNcQ KHXD/9fjRv22l68l7IfxbcQnjZxs4/S6S0aDRad5BGjZ9TbVEhTGuuTtQqcH3vZlMa Siw+84dNlAlVVzvfSrMI067rafVMa4BZHPnzWNsDgdS02CdcDMajkswexssLpGT01t l2AFzuHdfvAep6hvoUoVEMXRoVxLbpZN+6DdicEMa0CRcEk/LeolZuI3xJ3MSFXuaj MiCbwlnKTnNt1QTVHluGORCKmpwIjnHxYZ/R8g+wKMdXrh00H0Yb3w3Ov8DaBB5Rkt tvc2mqgRywIIg== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [153.142.97.92] From: Masahiro Yamada To: Andrew Morton , linux-arch Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy , Mathieu Malaterre , Masahiro Yamada Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 08/11] powerpc/prom_init: mark prom_getprop() and prom_getproplen() as __init Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:49:56 +0900 Message-Id: <20190423034959.13525-9-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> References: <20190423034959.13525-1-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org This prepares to move CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING from x86 to a common place. We need to eliminate potential issues beforehand. If it is enabled for powerpc, the following modpost warnings are reported: WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x20): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getprop() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getprop() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getprop lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x3c): Section mismatch in reference from the function .prom_getproplen() to the function .init.text:.call_prom() The function .prom_getproplen() references the function __init .call_prom(). This is often because .prom_getproplen lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of .call_prom is wrong. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada --- Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: - split into a separate patch arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c index f33ff4163a51..241fe6b7a8cc 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c @@ -501,14 +501,14 @@ static int __init prom_next_node(phandle *nodep) } } -static inline int prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, - void *value, size_t valuelen) +static inline int __init prom_getprop(phandle node, const char *pname, + void *value, size_t valuelen) { return call_prom("getprop", 4, 1, node, ADDR(pname), (u32)(unsigned long) value, (u32) valuelen); } -static inline int prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) +static inline int __init prom_getproplen(phandle node, const char *pname) { return call_prom("getproplen", 2, 1, node, ADDR(pname)); } -- 2.17.1