From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
"Kevin ldir Darbyshire-Bryant" <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>,
"Petr Štetiar" <ynezz@true.cz>, "John Crispin" <john@phrozen.org>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Paul Burton" <paul.burton@mips.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
"James Hogan" <jhogan@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Jason Cooper" <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 22/51] MIPS: perf: ath79: Fix perfcount IRQ assignment
Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 12:55:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190515090623.646690226@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190515090616.669619870@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit a1e8783db8e0d58891681bc1e6d9ada66eae8e20 ]
Currently it's not possible to use perf on ath79 due to genirq flags
mismatch happening on static virtual IRQ 13 which is used for
performance counters hardware IRQ 5.
On TP-Link Archer C7v5:
CPU0
2: 0 MIPS 2 ath9k
4: 318 MIPS 4 19000000.eth
7: 55034 MIPS 7 timer
8: 1236 MISC 3 ttyS0
12: 0 INTC 1 ehci_hcd:usb1
13: 0 gpio-ath79 2 keys
14: 0 gpio-ath79 5 keys
15: 31 AR724X PCI 1 ath10k_pci
$ perf top
genirq: Flags mismatch irq 13. 00014c83 (mips_perf_pmu) vs. 00002003 (keys)
On TP-Link Archer C7v4:
CPU0
4: 0 MIPS 4 19000000.eth
5: 7135 MIPS 5 1a000000.eth
7: 98379 MIPS 7 timer
8: 30 MISC 3 ttyS0
12: 90028 INTC 0 ath9k
13: 5520 INTC 1 ehci_hcd:usb1
14: 4623 INTC 2 ehci_hcd:usb2
15: 32844 AR724X PCI 1 ath10k_pci
16: 0 gpio-ath79 16 keys
23: 0 gpio-ath79 23 keys
$ perf top
genirq: Flags mismatch irq 13. 00014c80 (mips_perf_pmu) vs. 00000080 (ehci_hcd:usb1)
This problem is happening, because currently statically assigned virtual
IRQ 13 for performance counters is not claimed during the initialization
of MIPS PMU during the bootup, so the IRQ subsystem doesn't know, that
this interrupt isn't available for further use.
So this patch fixes the issue by simply booking hardware IRQ 5 for MIPS PMU.
Tested-by: Kevin 'ldir' Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
Acked-by: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@mips.com>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: James Hogan <jhogan@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/mips/ath79/setup.c | 6 ------
drivers/irqchip/irq-ath79-misc.c | 11 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/ath79/setup.c b/arch/mips/ath79/setup.c
index 26a058d58d37b..c7c31e2148136 100644
--- a/arch/mips/ath79/setup.c
+++ b/arch/mips/ath79/setup.c
@@ -183,12 +183,6 @@ const char *get_system_type(void)
return ath79_sys_type;
}
-int get_c0_perfcount_int(void)
-{
- return ATH79_MISC_IRQ(5);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_c0_perfcount_int);
-
unsigned int get_c0_compare_int(void)
{
return CP0_LEGACY_COMPARE_IRQ;
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ath79-misc.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ath79-misc.c
index aa72907846360..0390603170b40 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ath79-misc.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ath79-misc.c
@@ -22,6 +22,15 @@
#define AR71XX_RESET_REG_MISC_INT_ENABLE 4
#define ATH79_MISC_IRQ_COUNT 32
+#define ATH79_MISC_PERF_IRQ 5
+
+static int ath79_perfcount_irq;
+
+int get_c0_perfcount_int(void)
+{
+ return ath79_perfcount_irq;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_c0_perfcount_int);
static void ath79_misc_irq_handler(struct irq_desc *desc)
{
@@ -113,6 +122,8 @@ static void __init ath79_misc_intc_domain_init(
{
void __iomem *base = domain->host_data;
+ ath79_perfcount_irq = irq_create_mapping(domain, ATH79_MISC_PERF_IRQ);
+
/* Disable and clear all interrupts */
__raw_writel(0, base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_MISC_INT_ENABLE);
__raw_writel(0, base + AR71XX_RESET_REG_MISC_INT_STATUS);
--
2.20.1
parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-15 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20190515090616.669619870@linuxfoundation.org>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190515090623.646690226@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=john@phrozen.org \
--cc=ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=paul.burton@mips.com \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ynezz@true.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).