From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393A4C282CE for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D2224576 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726826AbfFDHCb (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:02:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33586 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726547AbfFDHCb (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jun 2019 03:02:31 -0400 Received: by newverein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 46D4E68B02; Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:02:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:02:05 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Oleg Nesterov , Arnd Bergmann Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: remove asm-generic/ptrace.h v2 Message-ID: <20190604070205.GA15438@lst.de> References: <20190520060018.25569-1-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190520060018.25569-1-hch@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Is anyone going to pick this series up? On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 08:00:13AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi all, > > asm-generic/ptrace.h is a little weird in that it doesn't actually > implement any functionality, but it provided multiple layers of macros > that just implement trivial inline functions. We implement those > directly in the few architectures and be off with a much simpler > design. > > Changes since v1: > - add a missing empty line between functions ---end quoted text---