From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A67DC3A59F for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6665720828 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 11:38:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726983AbfH2LiT (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:38:19 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:39765 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726379AbfH2LiS (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:38:18 -0400 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1i3Ikr-0000FK-01; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:38:17 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E222C2767; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 13:33:20 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Tommy Jin Cc: "linux-mips@vger.kernel.org" , Zhongwu Zhu Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS64: add KASAN support Message-ID: <20190829113320.GB9113@alpha.franken.de> References: <1566894474-31011-1-git-send-email-tjin@wavecomp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1566894474-31011-1-git-send-email-tjin@wavecomp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 08:28:38AM +0000, Tommy Jin wrote: > +/* 64-bit segment value. */ > +#define XKPHYS_CACHE_SEG (0xa8) that's just cachable coherent exclusive on write, what about cachable non coherent (0x98) and cachable exclusive (0xa0) ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]