From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: "James Hogan" <jhogan@kernel.org>,
"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 15/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot array based on number of used slots
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:07:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024230744.14543-16-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191024230744.14543-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Now that the memslot logic doesn't assume memslots are always non-NULL,
dynamically size the array of memslots instead of unconditionally
allocating memory for the maximum number of memslots.
Note, because a to-be-deleted memslot must first be invalidated, the
array size cannot be immediately reduced when deleting a memslot.
However, consecutive deletions will realize the memory savings, i.e.
a second deletion will trim the entry.
Tested-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 +-
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index b5d4133a11e1..2d73b6e5fe6e 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -432,11 +432,11 @@ static inline int kvm_arch_vcpu_memslots_id(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
*/
struct kvm_memslots {
u64 generation;
- struct kvm_memory_slot memslots[KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM];
/* The mapping table from slot id to the index in memslots[]. */
short id_to_index[KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM];
atomic_t lru_slot;
int used_slots;
+ struct kvm_memory_slot memslots[];
};
struct kvm {
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 7bc88375cf53..7dd02ee6ef95 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ static struct kvm_memslots *kvm_alloc_memslots(void)
return NULL;
for (i = 0; i < KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM; i++)
- slots->id_to_index[i] = slots->memslots[i].id = -1;
+ slots->id_to_index[i] = -1;
return slots;
}
@@ -1015,6 +1015,32 @@ static struct kvm_memslots *install_new_memslots(struct kvm *kvm,
return old_memslots;
}
+/*
+ * Note, at a minimum, the current number of used slots must be allocated, even
+ * when deleting a memslot, as we need a complete duplicate of the memslots for
+ * use when invalidating a memslot prior to deleting/moving the memslot.
+ */
+static struct kvm_memslots *kvm_dup_memslots(struct kvm_memslots *old,
+ enum kvm_mr_change change)
+{
+ struct kvm_memslots *slots;
+ size_t old_size, new_size;
+
+ old_size = sizeof(struct kvm_memslots) +
+ (sizeof(struct kvm_memory_slot) * old->used_slots);
+
+ if (change == KVM_MR_CREATE)
+ new_size = old_size + sizeof(struct kvm_memory_slot);
+ else
+ new_size = old_size;
+
+ slots = kvzalloc(new_size, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ if (likely(slots))
+ memcpy(slots, old, old_size);
+
+ return slots;
+}
+
static int kvm_set_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem,
const struct kvm_memory_slot *old,
@@ -1025,10 +1051,9 @@ static int kvm_set_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memslots *slots;
int r;
- slots = kvzalloc(sizeof(struct kvm_memslots), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ slots = kvm_dup_memslots(__kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id), change);
if (!slots)
return -ENOMEM;
- memcpy(slots, __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id), sizeof(struct kvm_memslots));
if (change == KVM_MR_DELETE || change == KVM_MR_MOVE) {
/*
--
2.22.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-24 23:07 [PATCH v3 00/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] KVM: Reinstall old memslots if arch preparation fails Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] KVM: Don't free new memslot if allocation of said memslot fails Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] KVM: PPC: Move memslot memory allocation into prepare_memory_region() Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] KVM: x86: Allocate memslot resources during prepare_memory_region() Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] KVM: Drop kvm_arch_create_memslot() Sean Christopherson
2019-12-16 8:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] KVM: Explicitly free allocated-but-unused dirty bitmap Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] KVM: Refactor error handling for setting memory region Sean Christopherson
2019-12-05 9:49 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] KVM: Move setting of memslot into helper routine Sean Christopherson
2019-12-05 9:54 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] KVM: Move memslot deletion to helper function Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] KVM: Simplify kvm_free_memslot() and all its descendents Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] KVM: Clean up local variable usage in __kvm_set_memory_region() Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] KVM: Provide common implementation for generic dirty log functions Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] KVM: Ensure validity of memslot with respect to kvm_get_dirty_log() Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] KVM: Terminate memslot walks via used_slots Sean Christopherson
2019-10-24 23:07 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2019-10-25 13:28 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] KVM: Dynamically size memslot arrays Christoffer Dall
2019-10-25 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-12-03 22:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-13 20:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-12-16 8:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-12-17 17:55 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191024230744.14543-16-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jhogan@kernel.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=julien.thierry.kdev@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).