linux-mips.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lichao Liu <liulichao@loongson.cn>
To: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, yuanjunqing@loongson.cn,
	chenhc@lemote.com, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lichao Liu <liulichao@loongson.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] MIPS: Grant pte read permission, even if vma only have VM_WRITE permission.
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 08:58:45 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200630005845.1239974-1-liulichao@loongson.cn> (raw)

Background:
a cpu have RIXI feature.

Now, if a vma only have VM_WRITE permission, the vma->vm_page_prot will
set _PAGE_NO_READ. In general case, someone read the vma will trigger
RI exception, then do_page_fault will handle it.

But in the following scene, program will hang.

example scene(a trinity test case):
futex_wake_op() will read uaddr, which is passed from user space.
If a program mmap a vma, which only have VM_WRITE permission,
then call futex, and use an address belonging to the vma as uaddr
argument. futex_wake_op() will read the address after disable
pagefault and set correct __ex_table(return -14 directly),
do_page_fault will find the correct __ex_table, and then return -14.
Then futex_wake_op() will try to fixup this error by call
fault_in_user_writeable(), because the pte have write permission,
so handle_mm_fault will do nothing, and return success.
But the RI bit in pte and tlb entry still exsits.
The program will deadloop:
do_page_fault -> find __ex_table success -> return -14;
futex_wake_op -> call fault_in_user_writeable() to fix the error -> retry;
do_page_fault -> find __ex_table success -> return -14;
futex_wake_op -> call fault_in_user_writeable() to fix the error -> retry;
.....

The first perspective of root cause:
Futex think a pte have write permission will have read permission.
When page fault, it only try to fixup with FAULT_FLAG_WRITE.

The second perspective of root cause:
MIPS platform doesn't grant pte read permission, if vma only have
VM_WRITE permission.But X86 and arm64 will.

Most of the architecture will grant pte read permission, even if
the vma only have VM_WRITE permission.
And if the cpu doesn't have RIXI feature, MIPS platform will
grant pte read permission by set _PAGE_READ.
So I think we should fixup thix problem by grant pte read permission,
even if vma only have VM_WRITE permission.

Signed-off-by: Lichao Liu <liulichao@loongson.cn>
---
 arch/mips/mm/cache.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/mm/cache.c b/arch/mips/mm/cache.c
index ad6df1cea866..72b60c44a962 100644
--- a/arch/mips/mm/cache.c
+++ b/arch/mips/mm/cache.c
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static inline void setup_protection_map(void)
 	if (cpu_has_rixi) {
 		protection_map[0]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC | _PAGE_NO_READ);
 		protection_map[1]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC);
-		protection_map[2]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC | _PAGE_NO_READ);
+		protection_map[2]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC);
 		protection_map[3]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC);
 		protection_map[4]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT);
 		protection_map[5]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT);
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline void setup_protection_map(void)
 
 		protection_map[8]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC | _PAGE_NO_READ);
 		protection_map[9]  = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC);
-		protection_map[10] = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC | _PAGE_WRITE | _PAGE_NO_READ);
+		protection_map[10] = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC | _PAGE_WRITE);
 		protection_map[11] = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_NO_EXEC | _PAGE_WRITE);
 		protection_map[12] = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT);
 		protection_map[13] = __pgprot(_page_cachable_default | _PAGE_PRESENT);
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-30  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-30  0:58 Lichao Liu [this message]
2020-07-17  9:55 Lichao Liu
2020-07-22  9:36 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2020-07-24  1:50   ` Lichao Liu
2020-07-31 22:37     ` Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200630005845.1239974-1-liulichao@loongson.cn \
    --to=liulichao@loongson.cn \
    --cc=chenhc@lemote.com \
    --cc=jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    --cc=yuanjunqing@loongson.cn \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Grant pte read permission, even if vma only have VM_WRITE permission.' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).