From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1788C433E1 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A641A206D8 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729195AbgG1U5T (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:57:19 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:52456 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728202AbgG1U5T (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2020 16:57:19 -0400 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1k0Wez-0007gK-01; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:57:17 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7636FC0A9B; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:51:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 22:51:55 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: Paul Cercueil , "H. Nikolaus Schaller" , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] MIPS: ingenic: Enable JZ4780_NEMC manually Message-ID: <20200728205155.GB22052@alpha.franken.de> References: <20200728104503.23655-1-krzk@kernel.org> <20200728104503.23655-2-krzk@kernel.org> <20200728111935.GA26683@kozik-lap> <20200728113702.GB13443@alpha.franken.de> <20200728120035.GA28766@kozik-lap> <20200728125308.GA344@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20200728125308.GA344@kozik-lap> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:53:08PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 02:51:23PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > > > > > > Le mar. 28 juil. 2020 à 14:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit > > : > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:37:02PM +0200, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:19:35PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:12:11PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote: > > > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 28 juil. 2020 à 12:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > a écrit > > > > > > : > > > > > > > The CONFIG_JZ4780_NEMC was previously a default on MIPS but > > > > now it has > > > > > > > to be enabled manually. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > > > > > > > > > > > I think you should swap the two so that there are no problems > > > > when > > > > > > bisecting. > > > > > > > > > > Good point. I was thinking that it will go via some of MIPS trees > > > > and > > > > > the patch #1 will just wait a cycle. However with acks, I can > > > > take it > > > > > through drivers/memory tree. > > > > > > > > I've acked the patch. > > > > > > > > Thomas. > > > > > > Thanks but now I noticed that one of changed configs > > > (arch/mips/configs/rs90_defconfig) is only in MIPS tree. > > > > > > I think it is easier then to take the patch #2 (configs) via MIPS and > > > wait with #1 for the next cycle or also take it via MIPS if it applies > > > cleanly. > > > > Why not take them both in the MIPS tree then? Would that conflict with > > changes in your tree? > > Exactly (last part of my sentence). There should be no conflicts. I've applied both patches to mips-next. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]