linux-mips.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@wp.pl>
To: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, olek2@wp.pl, hauke@hauke-m.de,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: lantiq_xrx200: convert to build_skb
Date: Tue,  4 Jan 2022 16:11:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220104151144.181736-4-olek2@wp.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220104151144.181736-1-olek2@wp.pl>

We can increase the efficiency of rx path by using buffers to receive
packets then build SKBs around them just before passing into the network
stack. In contrast, preallocating SKBs too early reduces CPU cache
efficiency.

NAT Performance results on BT Home Hub 5A (kernel 5.10.89, mtu 1500):

	Down		Up
Before	577 Mbps	648 Mbps
After	624 Mbps	695 Mbps

Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@wp.pl>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
index 7cebf4a601bc..41d11137cde0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
@@ -63,7 +63,11 @@ struct xrx200_chan {
 
 	struct napi_struct napi;
 	struct ltq_dma_channel dma;
-	struct sk_buff *skb[LTQ_DESC_NUM];
+
+	union {
+		struct sk_buff *skb[LTQ_DESC_NUM];
+		void *rx_buff[LTQ_DESC_NUM];
+	};
 
 	struct sk_buff *skb_head;
 	struct sk_buff *skb_tail;
@@ -78,6 +82,7 @@ struct xrx200_priv {
 	struct xrx200_chan chan_rx;
 
 	u16 rx_buf_size;
+	u16 rx_skb_size;
 
 	struct net_device *net_dev;
 	struct device *dev;
@@ -115,6 +120,12 @@ static int xrx200_buffer_size(int mtu)
 	return round_up(xrx200_max_frame_len(mtu), 4 * XRX200_DMA_BURST_LEN);
 }
 
+static int xrx200_skb_size(u16 buf_size)
+{
+	return SKB_DATA_ALIGN(buf_size + NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN) +
+		SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+}
+
 /* drop all the packets from the DMA ring */
 static void xrx200_flush_dma(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
 {
@@ -173,30 +184,29 @@ static int xrx200_close(struct net_device *net_dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int xrx200_alloc_skb(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
+static int xrx200_alloc_buf(struct xrx200_chan *ch, void *(*alloc)(unsigned int size))
 {
-	struct sk_buff *skb = ch->skb[ch->dma.desc];
+	void *buf = ch->rx_buff[ch->dma.desc];
 	struct xrx200_priv *priv = ch->priv;
 	dma_addr_t mapping;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	ch->skb[ch->dma.desc] = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(priv->net_dev,
-							  priv->rx_buf_size);
-	if (!ch->skb[ch->dma.desc]) {
+	ch->rx_buff[ch->dma.desc] = alloc(priv->rx_skb_size);
+	if (!ch->rx_buff[ch->dma.desc]) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto skip;
 	}
 
-	mapping = dma_map_single(priv->dev, ch->skb[ch->dma.desc]->data,
+	mapping = dma_map_single(priv->dev, ch->rx_buff[ch->dma.desc],
 				 priv->rx_buf_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
 	if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(priv->dev, mapping))) {
-		dev_kfree_skb_any(ch->skb[ch->dma.desc]);
-		ch->skb[ch->dma.desc] = skb;
+		skb_free_frag(ch->rx_buff[ch->dma.desc]);
+		ch->rx_buff[ch->dma.desc] = buf;
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto skip;
 	}
 
-	ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc].addr = mapping;
+	ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc].addr = mapping + NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN;
 	/* Make sure the address is written before we give it to HW */
 	wmb();
 skip:
@@ -210,13 +220,14 @@ static int xrx200_hw_receive(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
 {
 	struct xrx200_priv *priv = ch->priv;
 	struct ltq_dma_desc *desc = &ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc];
-	struct sk_buff *skb = ch->skb[ch->dma.desc];
+	void *buf = ch->rx_buff[ch->dma.desc];
 	u32 ctl = desc->ctl;
 	int len = (ctl & LTQ_DMA_SIZE_MASK);
 	struct net_device *net_dev = priv->net_dev;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = xrx200_alloc_skb(ch);
+	ret = xrx200_alloc_buf(ch, napi_alloc_frag);
 
 	ch->dma.desc++;
 	ch->dma.desc %= LTQ_DESC_NUM;
@@ -227,19 +238,21 @@ static int xrx200_hw_receive(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	skb = build_skb(buf, priv->rx_skb_size);
+	skb_reserve(skb, NET_SKB_PAD);
 	skb_put(skb, len);
 
 	/* add buffers to skb via skb->frag_list */
 	if (ctl & LTQ_DMA_SOP) {
 		ch->skb_head = skb;
 		ch->skb_tail = skb;
+		skb_reserve(skb, NET_IP_ALIGN);
 	} else if (ch->skb_head) {
 		if (ch->skb_head == ch->skb_tail)
 			skb_shinfo(ch->skb_tail)->frag_list = skb;
 		else
 			ch->skb_tail->next = skb;
 		ch->skb_tail = skb;
-		skb_reserve(ch->skb_tail, -NET_IP_ALIGN);
 		ch->skb_head->len += skb->len;
 		ch->skb_head->data_len += skb->len;
 		ch->skb_head->truesize += skb->truesize;
@@ -395,12 +408,13 @@ xrx200_change_mtu(struct net_device *net_dev, int new_mtu)
 	struct xrx200_chan *ch_rx = &priv->chan_rx;
 	int old_mtu = net_dev->mtu;
 	bool running = false;
-	struct sk_buff *skb;
+	void *buff;
 	int curr_desc;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	net_dev->mtu = new_mtu;
 	priv->rx_buf_size = xrx200_buffer_size(new_mtu);
+	priv->rx_skb_size = xrx200_skb_size(priv->rx_buf_size);
 
 	if (new_mtu <= old_mtu)
 		return ret;
@@ -416,14 +430,15 @@ xrx200_change_mtu(struct net_device *net_dev, int new_mtu)
 
 	for (ch_rx->dma.desc = 0; ch_rx->dma.desc < LTQ_DESC_NUM;
 	     ch_rx->dma.desc++) {
-		skb = ch_rx->skb[ch_rx->dma.desc];
-		ret = xrx200_alloc_skb(ch_rx);
+		buff = ch_rx->rx_buff[ch_rx->dma.desc];
+		ret = xrx200_alloc_buf(ch_rx, netdev_alloc_frag);
 		if (ret) {
 			net_dev->mtu = old_mtu;
 			priv->rx_buf_size = xrx200_buffer_size(old_mtu);
+			priv->rx_skb_size = xrx200_skb_size(priv->rx_buf_size);
 			break;
 		}
-		dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
+		skb_free_frag(buff);
 	}
 
 	ch_rx->dma.desc = curr_desc;
@@ -476,7 +491,7 @@ static int xrx200_dma_init(struct xrx200_priv *priv)
 	ltq_dma_alloc_rx(&ch_rx->dma);
 	for (ch_rx->dma.desc = 0; ch_rx->dma.desc < LTQ_DESC_NUM;
 	     ch_rx->dma.desc++) {
-		ret = xrx200_alloc_skb(ch_rx);
+		ret = xrx200_alloc_buf(ch_rx, netdev_alloc_frag);
 		if (ret)
 			goto rx_free;
 	}
@@ -511,7 +526,7 @@ static int xrx200_dma_init(struct xrx200_priv *priv)
 	/* free the allocated RX ring */
 	for (i = 0; i < LTQ_DESC_NUM; i++) {
 		if (priv->chan_rx.skb[i])
-			dev_kfree_skb_any(priv->chan_rx.skb[i]);
+			skb_free_frag(priv->chan_rx.rx_buff[i]);
 	}
 
 rx_free:
@@ -528,7 +543,7 @@ static void xrx200_hw_cleanup(struct xrx200_priv *priv)
 
 	/* free the allocated RX ring */
 	for (i = 0; i < LTQ_DESC_NUM; i++)
-		dev_kfree_skb_any(priv->chan_rx.skb[i]);
+		skb_free_frag(priv->chan_rx.rx_buff[i]);
 }
 
 static int xrx200_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -553,6 +568,7 @@ static int xrx200_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	net_dev->min_mtu = ETH_ZLEN;
 	net_dev->max_mtu = XRX200_DMA_DATA_LEN - xrx200_max_frame_len(0);
 	priv->rx_buf_size = xrx200_buffer_size(ETH_DATA_LEN);
+	priv->rx_skb_size = xrx200_skb_size(priv->rx_buf_size);
 
 	/* load the memory ranges */
 	priv->pmac_reg = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, NULL);
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-01-04 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-04 15:11 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: lantiq_xrx200: improve ethernet performance Aleksander Jan Bajkowski
2022-01-04 15:11 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] MIPS: lantiq: dma: increase descritor count Aleksander Jan Bajkowski
2022-01-04 15:11 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net: lantiq_xrx200: increase napi poll weigth Aleksander Jan Bajkowski
2022-01-04 15:11 ` Aleksander Jan Bajkowski [this message]
2022-01-04 17:42   ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: lantiq_xrx200: convert to build_skb Eric Dumazet
2022-01-08 16:44     ` Aleksander Bajkowski
2022-01-06  1:30 ` [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: lantiq_xrx200: improve ethernet performance patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220104151144.181736-4-olek2@wp.pl \
    --to=olek2@wp.pl \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tsbogend@alpha.franken.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).