From: zhouyanjie <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> To: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net> Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, paul.burton@mips.com, paulburton@kernel.org, mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, sernia.zhou@foxmail.com, zhenwenjin@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust cgu code to make it compatible with X1830. Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 20:16:32 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <5DF4D2A0.3010603@wanyeetech.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1576272301.3.3@crapouillou.net> Hi Paul, On 2019年12月14日 05:25, Paul Cercueil wrote: > Hi Zhou, > > > Le ven., déc. 13, 2019 at 23:21, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) > <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> a écrit : >> The PLL of X1830 Soc from Ingenic has been greatly changed, >> the bypass control is placed in another register, so now two >> registers may needed to control the PLL. To this end, the >> original "reg" was changed to "pll_reg", and a new "bypass_reg" >> was introduced. In addition, when calculating rate, the PLL of >> X1830 introduced an extra 2x multiplier, so a new "rate_multiplier" >> was introduced. >> >> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> >> --- >> >> Notes: >> v1->v2: >> 1.Use two fields (pll_reg & bypass_reg) instead of the 2-values >> array (reg[2]). >> 2.Remove the "pll_info->version" and add a >> "pll_info->rate_multiplier". >> 3.Fix the coding style and add more detailed commit message. >> 4.Change my Signed-off-by from "Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@zoho.com>" >> to "周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com>" because >> the old mailbox is in an unstable state. >> >> drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++----------- >> drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h | 8 ++++++-- >> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c >> index 6e96303..ae1ddcb 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.c >> @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned >> long parent_rate) >> pll_info = &clk_info->pll; >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags); >> - ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags); >> >> m = (ctl >> pll_info->m_shift) & GENMASK(pll_info->m_bits - 1, 0); >> @@ -93,6 +93,11 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >> unsigned long parent_rate) >> n += pll_info->n_offset; >> od_enc = ctl >> pll_info->od_shift; >> od_enc &= GENMASK(pll_info->od_bits - 1, 0); >> + >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags); >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->bypass_reg); >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags); > > I think you should start the patchset with the current [5/5] patch; > then you wouldn't have to add spinlock protection here just to see it > removed later in the same patchset. > OK, I will adjust their order in v3. Thanks and best regards! > Cheers, > -Paul > >> + >> bypass = !pll_info->no_bypass_bit && >> !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit)); >> >> @@ -106,7 +111,7 @@ ingenic_pll_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >> unsigned long parent_rate) >> BUG_ON(od == pll_info->od_max); >> od++; >> >> - return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od); >> + return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m * pll_info->rate_multiplier, >> n * od); >> } >> >> static unsigned long >> @@ -139,7 +144,7 @@ ingenic_pll_calc(const struct >> ingenic_cgu_clk_info *clk_info, >> if (pod) >> *pod = od; >> >> - return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m, n * od); >> + return div_u64((u64)parent_rate * m * pll_info->rate_multiplier, >> n * od); >> } >> >> static inline const struct ingenic_cgu_clk_info *to_clk_info( >> @@ -183,7 +188,7 @@ ingenic_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned >> long req_rate, >> clk_info->name, req_rate, rate); >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags); >> - ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> >> ctl &= ~(GENMASK(pll_info->m_bits - 1, 0) << pll_info->m_shift); >> ctl |= (m - pll_info->m_offset) << pll_info->m_shift; >> @@ -194,7 +199,7 @@ ingenic_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned >> long req_rate, >> ctl &= ~(GENMASK(pll_info->od_bits - 1, 0) << pll_info->od_shift); >> ctl |= pll_info->od_encoding[od - 1] << pll_info->od_shift; >> >> - writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags); >> >> return 0; >> @@ -212,16 +217,21 @@ static int ingenic_pll_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) >> u32 ctl; >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags); >> - ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->bypass_reg); >> >> ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->bypass_bit); >> + >> + writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->bypass_reg); >> + >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> + >> ctl |= BIT(pll_info->enable_bit); >> >> - writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> >> /* wait for the PLL to stabilise */ >> for (i = 0; i < timeout; i++) { >> - ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> if (ctl & BIT(pll_info->stable_bit)) >> break; >> mdelay(1); >> @@ -245,11 +255,11 @@ static void ingenic_pll_disable(struct clk_hw *hw) >> u32 ctl; >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags); >> - ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> >> ctl &= ~BIT(pll_info->enable_bit); >> >> - writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + writel(ctl, cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags); >> } >> >> @@ -263,7 +273,7 @@ static int ingenic_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw) >> u32 ctl; >> >> spin_lock_irqsave(&cgu->lock, flags); >> - ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->reg); >> + ctl = readl(cgu->base + pll_info->pll_reg); >> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cgu->lock, flags); >> >> return !!(ctl & BIT(pll_info->enable_bit)); >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h >> index 0dc8004..f7b6908 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h >> +++ b/drivers/clk/ingenic/cgu.h >> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ >> >> /** >> * struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info - information about a PLL >> - * @reg: the offset of the PLL's control register within the CGU >> + * @pll_reg: the offset of the PLL's control register within the CGU >> + * @bypass_reg: the offset of the bypass control register within the >> CGU >> + * @rate_multiplier: the multiplier needed by pll rate calculation >> * @m_shift: the number of bits to shift the multiplier value by >> (ie. the >> * index of the lowest bit of the multiplier value in the >> PLL's >> * control register) >> @@ -43,7 +45,9 @@ >> * @no_bypass_bit: if set, the PLL has no bypass functionality >> */ >> struct ingenic_cgu_pll_info { >> - unsigned reg; >> + unsigned pll_reg; >> + unsigned bypass_reg; >> + unsigned rate_multiplier; >> const s8 *od_encoding; >> u8 m_shift, m_bits, m_offset; >> u8 n_shift, n_bits, n_offset; >> -- >> 2.7.4 >> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-14 12:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-12-13 15:21 clk: Ingenic: Add support for the X1830 v2 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust cgu code to make it compatible with X1830 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 2019-12-13 21:25 ` Paul Cercueil 2019-12-14 12:16 ` zhouyanjie [this message] 2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust code to make it compatible with new cgu code 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] dt-bindings: clock: Add X1830 bindings 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: Ingenic: Add CGU driver for X1830 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) 2019-12-13 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: Ingenic: Remove unnecessary spinlock when reading registers 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=5DF4D2A0.3010603@wanyeetech.com \ --to=zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \ --cc=paul.burton@mips.com \ --cc=paul@crapouillou.net \ --cc=paulburton@kernel.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \ --cc=sernia.zhou@foxmail.com \ --cc=zhenwenjin@gmail.com \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: Ingenic: Adjust cgu code to make it compatible with X1830.' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).