[PATCH][next] irqchip: irq-bcm7038-l1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[PATCH][next] irqchip: irq-bcm7038-l1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
index cbf01afcd2a6..eb9bce93cd05 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ struct bcm7038_l1_chip {
 
 struct bcm7038_l1_cpu {
 	void __iomem		*map_base;
-	u32			mask_cache[0];
+	u32			mask_cache[];
 };
 
 /*
-- 
2.23.0

Re: [PATCH][next] irqchip: irq-bcm7038-l1: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

[Marc Zyngier]

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 21:44:38 +0000,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com> wrote:
> 
> The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
> extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
> variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
> introduced in C99:
> 
> struct foo {
>         int stuff;
>         struct boo array[];
> };
> 
> By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
> in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
> will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
> inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
> 
> Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
> this change:
> 
> "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
> may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
> zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
> 
> This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
> [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
> [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm7038-l1.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Queued for 5.7.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Jazz is not dead, it just smells funny.